2012•African Journal of Pharmacy and PharmacologyOpen access

Comparisons of the uses of flurbiprofen, lidocaine and dexamethasone in preventing injection pain caused by propofol

Xuezheng Zhang

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The objective of the study is to compare the different effects of flurbiprofen, lidocaine and dexamethasone on reduction of pain caused by propofol injection. 100 patients undergoing middle otoplasty surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups with 25 patients in each group. F, L, D, and C groups were treated with intravenous flurbiprofen 50 mg/5 ml, lidocaine 40 mg/5 ml, dexamethasone 5 mg/5 ml and saline 5 ml, respectively, with a proximal tourniquet. The injection site pain was recorded immediately with verbal rating scale (VBS), and the tourniquet was released 2 min after, followed by propofol infusion at the rate of 0.5 ml/s to reach a final dose of 0.5 mg/kg, while the pain was recorded after the infusion. The follow up was done at 30 min and 4 h after the operations with the pain recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS). The injection site pain before propofol infusion in all groups showed no difference among each other; while the F, L, and D pre-treatment reduced the pain caused by propofol infusion in comparison to group C (P<0.05), without differences among the three groups. The post-operation pain at 30 min and 4 h in F group were lower than the other three groups (P<0.05). Flurbiprofen pre-injection could prevent the pain caused by propofol during infusion as well as the postoperative pain.   Key words: Flurbiprofen, dexamethasone, lidocaine, propofol, injection pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of the study is to compare the different effects of flurbiprofen, lidocaine and dexamethasone on reduction of pain caused by propofol injection. 100 patients undergoing middle otoplasty surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups with 25 patients in each group. F, L, D, and C groups were treated with intravenous flurbiprofen 50 mg/5 ml, lidocaine 40 mg/5 ml, dexamethasone 5 mg/5 ml and saline 5 ml, respectively, with a proximal tourniquet. The injection site pain was recorded immediately with verbal rating scale (VBS), and the tourniquet was released 2 min after, followed by propofol infusion at the rate of 0.5 ml/s to reach a final dose of 0.5 mg/kg, while the pain was recorded after the infusion. The follow up was done at 30 min and 4 h after the operations with the pain recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS). The injection site pain before propofol infusion in all groups showed no difference among each other; while the F, L, and D pre-treatment reduced the pain caused by propofol infusion in comparison to group C (P<0.05), without differences among the three groups. The post-operation pain at 30 min and 4 h in F group were lower than the other three groups (P<0.05). Flurbiprofen pre-injection could prevent the pain caused by propofol during infusion as well as the postoperative pain.   Key words: Flurbiprofen, dexamethasone, lidocaine, propofol, injection pain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of the study is to compare the different effects of flurbiprofen, lidocaine and dexamethasone on reduction of pain caused by propofol injection. 100 patients undergoing middle otoplasty surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned into four groups with 25 patients in each group. F, L, D, and C groups were treated with intravenous flurbiprofen 50 mg/5 ml, lidocaine 40 mg/5 ml, dexamethasone 5 mg/5 ml and saline 5 ml, respectively, with a proximal tourniquet. The injection site pain was recorded immediately with verbal rating scale (VBS), and the tourniquet was released 2 min after, followed by propofol infusion at the rate of 0.5 ml/s to reach a final dose of 0.5 mg/kg, while the pain was recorded after the infusion. The follow up was done at 30 min and 4 h after the operations with the pain recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS). The injection site pain before propofol infusion in all groups showed no difference among each other; while the F, L, and D pre-treatment reduced the pain caused by propofol infusion in comparison to group C (P<0.05), without differences among the three groups. The post-operation pain at 30 min and 4 h in F group were lower than the other three groups (P<0.05). Flurbiprofen pre-injection could prevent the pain caused by propofol during infusion as well as the postoperative pain.   Key words: Flurbiprofen, dexamethasone, lidocaine, propofol, injection pain.

Key concepts: Flurbiprofen, Lidocaine, Propofol, Anesthesia, Dexamethasone, Medicine, Pharmacology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparisons of the uses of flurbiprofen, lidocaine and dexamethasone in preventing injection pain caused by propofol — Research Paper | ScholarLens