Creating a coaching culture: relational field coaching
Marie‐Anne Chidiac
Abstract
Marie‐Anne Chidiac
Abstract
Purpose This paper aims to highlight a link between the rise of executive coaching practice and less importance being place on growing a coaching culture in organizations. This paper seeks to outline how a coaching culture can be fostered through an emphasis on a relational field coaching approach. Design/methodology/approach The main research method is based on case studies and action research from the author's own organizational practice. Findings The paper emphasizes that a focus on the context or situation of coaching is just as important as individual considerations in a coaching dyad. Practical implications The paper calls for a review of the effectiveness of one‐to‐one coaching compared to establishing an organizational coaching culture. Originality/value This paper is a timely reminder to leaders, managers and HR practitioners to review the cost effectiveness of procuring external coaching versus developing internal coaching capability. In addition, it challenges organizations to refocus on the continuum of coaching interactions rather than just the “external expert” role.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose This paper aims to highlight a link between the rise of executive coaching practice and less importance being place on growing a coaching culture in organizations. This paper seeks to outline how a coaching culture can be fostered through an emphasis on a relational field coaching approach. Design/methodology/approach The main research method is based on case studies and action research from the author's own organizational practice. Findings The paper emphasizes that a focus on the context or situation of coaching is just as important as individual considerations in a coaching dyad. Practical implications The paper calls for a review of the effectiveness of one‐to‐one coaching compared to establishing an organizational coaching culture. Originality/value This paper is a timely reminder to leaders, managers and HR practitioners to review the cost effectiveness of procuring external coaching versus developing internal coaching capability. In addition, it challenges organizations to refocus on the continuum of coaching interactions rather than just the “external expert” role.
Key concepts: Coaching, Context (archaeology), Psychology, Dyad, Originality, Knowledge management, Public relations, Social psychology