Combination and disproportionation reactions of allylic radicals with ethyl, propyl, and t‐Butyl Radicals
D. L. Baulch, P. K. Chown, Derek C. Montague
Abstract
D. L. Baulch, P. K. Chown, Derek C. Montague
Abstract
Abstract 1‐Methylallyl, 1,1‐dimethylallyl, 1,2‐dimethylallyl, 1,3‐dimethylallyl, 1,1,2‐trimethylallyl, and 1‐ethylallyl radicals have been generated in the gas phase at 20 ± 1°C by addition of H atoms, formed by Hg(63P1) photosensitization of H2, to appropriate dienes. Their combination reactions with ethyl radicals have been studied and the relative reactivities of the reaction centers in each allylic radical determined. Similar measurements have been made for some combination reactions of n‐propyl, i‐propyl, and t‐butyl with 1‐methylallyl and 1,1,2‐trimethylallyl radicals. The more substituted reaction centers are found to be the less reactive. In addition the self‐combination and disproportionation of 1‐methylallyl radicals has been investigated, as has cross disproportionation of each allylic radical with ethyl. The results establish a general pattern of reactivity for these radicals, which is interpreted primarily in terms of the effects of steric interaction during reaction.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract 1‐Methylallyl, 1,1‐dimethylallyl, 1,2‐dimethylallyl, 1,3‐dimethylallyl, 1,1,2‐trimethylallyl, and 1‐ethylallyl radicals have been generated in the gas phase at 20 ± 1°C by addition of H atoms, formed by Hg(63P1) photosensitization of H2, to appropriate dienes. Their combination reactions with ethyl radicals have been studied and the relative reactivities of the reaction centers in each allylic radical determined. Similar measurements have been made for some combination reactions of n‐propyl, i‐propyl, and t‐butyl with 1‐methylallyl and 1,1,2‐trimethylallyl radicals. The more substituted reaction centers are found to be the less reactive. In addition the self‐combination and disproportionation of 1‐methylallyl radicals has been investigated, as has cross disproportionation of each allylic radical with ethyl. The results establish a general pattern of reactivity for these radicals, which is interpreted primarily in terms of the effects of steric interaction during reaction.
Key concepts: Disproportionation, Chemistry, Radical, Radical disproportionation, Allylic rearrangement, Reactivity (psychology), Steric effects, Medicinal chemistry