2015Ecological Management & RestorationRequires access

Slashing may have potential for controlling Phragmites australis in long‐inundated parts of a Ramsar‐listed wetland

Joe Greet, Paul A. Rees

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Summary Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a natural component of many wetlands but can be highly invasive. Phragmites is encroaching into important mudflat habitat areas of the Ramsar‐listed Seaford Wetlands (Melbourne, Victoria), which are critical for migratory birds. We assessed the efficacy of slashing as a means of controlling Phragmites by establishing twelve 5 m × 5 m quadrats within mature Phragmites reed beds and slashing half of them. The response of Phragmites to slashing was highly variable and dependent on the elevation (i.e. subsequent flooding) of the slashed quadrats. Phragmites regrowth was minimal in lower‐lying quadrats which were wholly inundated for several months each of the following two years (to a mean depth of ~22 cm). In contrast, in quadrats of higher elevation, which were mostly only partially or shallowly inundated, Phragmites recovered almost completely within 10 months. In quadrats that were not slashed there was no change in Phragmites cover (i.e. it remained ~100%) irrespective of flooding extent. It is suspected that prolonged flooding above the height of the remaining stubble is necessary to prevent recovery. Thus, slashing may be a successful means of controlling Phragmites when low‐lying areas are targeted and these are subsequently flooded to a sufficient depth (e.g. >20 cm) for at least several months.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a natural component of many wetlands but can be highly invasive. Phragmites is encroaching into important mudflat habitat areas of the Ramsar‐listed Seaford Wetlands (Melbourne, Victoria), which are critical for migratory birds. We assessed the efficacy of slashing as a means of controlling Phragmites by establishing twelve 5 m × 5 m quadrats within mature Phragmites reed beds and slashing half of them. The response of Phragmites to slashing was highly variable and dependent on the elevation (i.e. subsequent flooding) of the slashed quadrats. Phragmites regrowth was minimal in lower‐lying quadrats which were wholly inundated for several months each of the following two years (to a mean depth of ~22 cm). In contrast, in quadrats of higher elevation, which were mostly only partially or shallowly inundated, Phragmites recovered almost completely within 10 months. In quadrats that were not slashed there was no change in Phragmites cover (i.e. it remained ~100%) irrespective of flooding extent. It is suspected that prolonged flooding above the height of the remaining stubble is necessary to prevent recovery. Thus, slashing may be a successful means of controlling Phragmites when low‐lying areas are targeted and these are subsequently flooded to a sufficient depth (e.g. >20 cm) for at least several months.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Phragmites or Common Reed (Phragmites australis) is a natural component of many wetlands but can be highly invasive. Phragmites is encroaching into important mudflat habitat areas of the Ramsar‐listed Seaford Wetlands (Melbourne, Victoria), which are critical for migratory birds. We assessed the efficacy of slashing as a means of controlling Phragmites by establishing twelve 5 m × 5 m quadrats within mature Phragmites reed beds and slashing half of them. The response of Phragmites to slashing was highly variable and dependent on the elevation (i.e. subsequent flooding) of the slashed quadrats. Phragmites regrowth was minimal in lower‐lying quadrats which were wholly inundated for several months each of the following two years (to a mean depth of ~22 cm). In contrast, in quadrats of higher elevation, which were mostly only partially or shallowly inundated, Phragmites recovered almost completely within 10 months. In quadrats that were not slashed there was no change in Phragmites cover (i.e. it remained ~100%) irrespective of flooding extent. It is suspected that prolonged flooding above the height of the remaining stubble is necessary to prevent recovery. Thus, slashing may be a successful means of controlling Phragmites when low‐lying areas are targeted and these are subsequently flooded to a sufficient depth (e.g. >20 cm) for at least several months.

Key concepts: Phragmites, Quadrat, Wetland, Flooding (psychology), Ecology, Environmental science, Ramsar site, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Slashing may have potential for controlling Phragmites australis in long‐inundated parts of a Ramsar‐listed wetland — Research Paper | ScholarLens