2015FigshareOpen access

Evaluation of Traditional Cooking Methods on Eating Meat Characteristics and Chemical composition

Iosr Journals, Yousif S. Adam, H.A. Abugroun

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the traditional meat cooking methods, beef topside cuts were used in the experiment and divided into four groups, and four different cooking methods were done. A-roosting, B-frying, C-boiling, and D- Babiker (1981) methods as a control method which is used as one of cooking loss % methods in meat. Sample prepared from cooked meat for meat chemical analysis. Protein, moisture, fat, and ash content % were determined. Cooking loss (%) and cooking time were determined and there were significantly different (p<0.05), and no difference in cooking loss (%). The sensory attributes for cooked meat were assessed by panelists and conducted color, flavor, tenderness and juiciness with significantly different (p<0.05) in flavor were panelists prefer the frying cooked meat.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study was conducted to evaluate the traditional meat cooking methods, beef topside cuts were used in the experiment and divided into four groups, and four different cooking methods were done. A-roosting, B-frying, C-boiling, and D- Babiker (1981) methods as a control method which is used as one of cooking loss % methods in meat. Sample prepared from cooked meat for meat chemical analysis. Protein, moisture, fat, and ash content % were determined. Cooking loss (%) and cooking time were determined and there were significantly different (p<0.05), and no difference in cooking loss (%). The sensory attributes for cooked meat were assessed by panelists and conducted color, flavor, tenderness and juiciness with significantly different (p<0.05) in flavor were panelists prefer the frying cooked meat.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the traditional meat cooking methods, beef topside cuts were used in the experiment and divided into four groups, and four different cooking methods were done. A-roosting, B-frying, C-boiling, and D- Babiker (1981) methods as a control method which is used as one of cooking loss % methods in meat. Sample prepared from cooked meat for meat chemical analysis. Protein, moisture, fat, and ash content % were determined. Cooking loss (%) and cooking time were determined and there were significantly different (p<0.05), and no difference in cooking loss (%). The sensory attributes for cooked meat were assessed by panelists and conducted color, flavor, tenderness and juiciness with significantly different (p<0.05) in flavor were panelists prefer the frying cooked meat.

Key concepts: Cooking methods, Food science, Tenderness, Flavor, Cooked meat, Chemistry, Moisture, White meat

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Traditional Cooking Methods on Eating Meat Characteristics and Chemical composition — Research Paper | ScholarLens