Use of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of leprosy
Adalberto Rezende Santos, J. C. Nery, Nádia Cristina Düppre, Maria Eugênia Noviski Gallo, Jose T. Goes Filho, Philip Noël Suffys, Wim Degrave
Abstract
Adalberto Rezende Santos, J. C. Nery, Nádia Cristina Düppre, Maria Eugênia Noviski Gallo, Jose T. Goes Filho, Philip Noël Suffys, Wim Degrave
Abstract
One of the main limitations for successful epidemiological control of leprosy is the lack of a method for its diagnosis in subclinical cases. Because of the long incubation period of the disease, liberation and spread of Mycobacterium leprae during subclinical stages-principally in cases of untreated multibacillary forms of leprosy-constitute the main source of infection. This report describes the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of M. leprae in different types of tissue samples (blood, lymph, nasal secretion and hair) from an individual who was suspected of having leprosy. Although no conclusive diagnosis could be made by traditional diagnostic methods, the individual was found to be infected with M. leprae after amplification of the bacterial DNA.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
One of the main limitations for successful epidemiological control of leprosy is the lack of a method for its diagnosis in subclinical cases. Because of the long incubation period of the disease, liberation and spread of Mycobacterium leprae during subclinical stages-principally in cases of untreated multibacillary forms of leprosy-constitute the main source of infection. This report describes the use of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of M. leprae in different types of tissue samples (blood, lymph, nasal secretion and hair) from an individual who was suspected of having leprosy. Although no conclusive diagnosis could be made by traditional diagnostic methods, the individual was found to be infected with M. leprae after amplification of the bacterial DNA.
Key concepts: Mycobacterium leprae, Leprosy, Subclinical infection, Polymerase chain reaction, Medicine, Immunology, Epidemiology, Incubation period