Comparing trophic position of stream fishes using stable isotope and gut contents analyses
S. M. Rybczynski, David Walters, Ken M. Fritz, Brent Johnson
Abstract
S. M. Rybczynski, David Walters, Ken M. Fritz, Brent Johnson
Abstract
Abstract – Stable isotope analysis (SIA) and gut contents analysis (GCA) are commonly used in food web studies, but few studies analyse these data in concert. We used SIA (δ15N) and GCA (% composition) to identify diets and trophic position (TP) of six stream fishes and to compare TP estimates between methods. Ordination analysis of gut contents identified two primary trophic groups, omnivores and predators. Significant differences in TPGCA and TPSIA were similar in direction among‐species and among‐trophic groups; neither method detected seasonal changes in omnivore diets. Within‐species TPGCA and TPSIA were similar except for one omnivore. TPGCA was less variable than TPSIA for predators, but variation between methods was similar for omnivores. While both methods were equally robust at discriminating trophic groups of fishes, TPSIA is less laborious to estimate and may facilitate cross‐stream comparisons of food web structure and energy flow.
OpenAlex reports 68 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract – Stable isotope analysis (SIA) and gut contents analysis (GCA) are commonly used in food web studies, but few studies analyse these data in concert. We used SIA (δ15N) and GCA (% composition) to identify diets and trophic position (TP) of six stream fishes and to compare TP estimates between methods. Ordination analysis of gut contents identified two primary trophic groups, omnivores and predators. Significant differences in TPGCA and TPSIA were similar in direction among‐species and among‐trophic groups; neither method detected seasonal changes in omnivore diets. Within‐species TPGCA and TPSIA were similar except for one omnivore. TPGCA was less variable than TPSIA for predators, but variation between methods was similar for omnivores. While both methods were equally robust at discriminating trophic groups of fishes, TPSIA is less laborious to estimate and may facilitate cross‐stream comparisons of food web structure and energy flow.
Key concepts: Trophic level, Omnivore, Biology, Food web, Predation, Isotope analysis, Ecology, Stable isotope ratio