2010Journal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresOpen access

A wave‐driven jet over a rocky shoal

Ryan P. Mulligan, Alex E. Hay, Anthony J. Bowen

Open full text 27 citations

Abstract

Field observations and model simulations are presented of flow generated by waves breaking over a shoal at the entrance to a shallow bay. The shoal is composed of a series of steep and narrow bedrock ridges with depths of 2–8 m at the ridge crests. Observations from instruments on the shoal indicated peak significant wave heights during a storm event were 2.4–4.0 m across the observation sites; this spatial variability is due to wave breaking over the ridges. The 2‐D depth‐averaged hydrodynamic model Delft3D, coupled to the wave model SWAN, was used to simulate the waves and wave‐driven flow over the shoal and throughout the entire bay with a nested fine grid (5 m resolution) to resolve the shoal bathymetry. The model predicts a well‐defined jet behind the shoal, with mean axial speeds of 0.4–0.7 m/s. The observations indicate maximum speeds behind the shoal of 0.3–0.4 m/s, exceeding the maximum tidal current speed by more than a factor of 4, that are consistent in timing and direction with the model predictions. The model overpredicts wave breaking over the steep slopes and as a result the current speeds are overestimated.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field observations and model simulations are presented of flow generated by waves breaking over a shoal at the entrance to a shallow bay. The shoal is composed of a series of steep and narrow bedrock ridges with depths of 2–8 m at the ridge crests. Observations from instruments on the shoal indicated peak significant wave heights during a storm event were 2.4–4.0 m across the observation sites; this spatial variability is due to wave breaking over the ridges. The 2‐D depth‐averaged hydrodynamic model Delft3D, coupled to the wave model SWAN, was used to simulate the waves and wave‐driven flow over the shoal and throughout the entire bay with a nested fine grid (5 m resolution) to resolve the shoal bathymetry. The model predicts a well‐defined jet behind the shoal, with mean axial speeds of 0.4–0.7 m/s. The observations indicate maximum speeds behind the shoal of 0.3–0.4 m/s, exceeding the maximum tidal current speed by more than a factor of 4, that are consistent in timing and direction with the model predictions. The model overpredicts wave breaking over the steep slopes and as a result the current speeds are overestimated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field observations and model simulations are presented of flow generated by waves breaking over a shoal at the entrance to a shallow bay. The shoal is composed of a series of steep and narrow bedrock ridges with depths of 2–8 m at the ridge crests. Observations from instruments on the shoal indicated peak significant wave heights during a storm event were 2.4–4.0 m across the observation sites; this spatial variability is due to wave breaking over the ridges. The 2‐D depth‐averaged hydrodynamic model Delft3D, coupled to the wave model SWAN, was used to simulate the waves and wave‐driven flow over the shoal and throughout the entire bay with a nested fine grid (5 m resolution) to resolve the shoal bathymetry. The model predicts a well‐defined jet behind the shoal, with mean axial speeds of 0.4–0.7 m/s. The observations indicate maximum speeds behind the shoal of 0.3–0.4 m/s, exceeding the maximum tidal current speed by more than a factor of 4, that are consistent in timing and direction with the model predictions. The model overpredicts wave breaking over the steep slopes and as a result the current speeds are overestimated.

Key concepts: Shoal, Geology, Bathymetry, Breaking wave, Ridge, Wave model, Jet (fluid), Current (fluid)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A wave‐driven jet over a rocky shoal — Research Paper | ScholarLens