1955American Journal of PhysicsRequires access

Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity

Adolf Grünbaum

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

It is argued that the correct understanding and teaching of the special theory of relativity are still impaired by a number of specific, widespread misconceptions. To remove these, the relevant definitional, experimental, and philosophical foundations of the kinematics of the theory are made explicit by reference to the following issues: (i) the relativity of simultaneity, which arises, in the first instance, within a single Galilean frame, (ii) the principle of the constancy of the speed of light, which rests on three distinct experimental facts as well as on an important convention, made possible by a fourth experimental result, (iii) the compatibility of the invariance of the speed of light with the absence of a retardation on the part of moving clocks, and the role of that optical principle in the deduction of the Lorentz transformations, (iv) the merits of the ad hoc charge against the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis; the philosophical sources of the difference between Lorentz' and Einstein's interpretations of the transformation equations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is argued that the correct understanding and teaching of the special theory of relativity are still impaired by a number of specific, widespread misconceptions. To remove these, the relevant definitional, experimental, and philosophical foundations of the kinematics of the theory are made explicit by reference to the following issues: (i) the relativity of simultaneity, which arises, in the first instance, within a single Galilean frame, (ii) the principle of the constancy of the speed of light, which rests on three distinct experimental facts as well as on an important convention, made possible by a fourth experimental result, (iii) the compatibility of the invariance of the speed of light with the absence of a retardation on the part of moving clocks, and the role of that optical principle in the deduction of the Lorentz transformations, (iv) the merits of the ad hoc charge against the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis; the philosophical sources of the difference between Lorentz' and Einstein's interpretations of the transformation equations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is argued that the correct understanding and teaching of the special theory of relativity are still impaired by a number of specific, widespread misconceptions. To remove these, the relevant definitional, experimental, and philosophical foundations of the kinematics of the theory are made explicit by reference to the following issues: (i) the relativity of simultaneity, which arises, in the first instance, within a single Galilean frame, (ii) the principle of the constancy of the speed of light, which rests on three distinct experimental facts as well as on an important convention, made possible by a fourth experimental result, (iii) the compatibility of the invariance of the speed of light with the absence of a retardation on the part of moving clocks, and the role of that optical principle in the deduction of the Lorentz transformations, (iv) the merits of the ad hoc charge against the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction hypothesis; the philosophical sources of the difference between Lorentz' and Einstein's interpretations of the transformation equations.

Key concepts: One-way speed of light, Principle of relativity, Test theories of special relativity, Lorentz transformation, Physics, Length contraction, Galilean transformation, Tests of special relativity

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Logical and Philosophical Foundations of the Special Theory of Relativity — Research Paper | ScholarLens