2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Developing Optimized Concrete Pavement Designs Using the DARWin-ME / Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide and Cost Analysis

James W. Mack, Corey Zollinger

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Historically pavement designs have been based on an engineering analysis where the pavement thickness and features are chosen to meet the traffic, environmental, and subgrade conditions for the project. For concrete pavements, this means that the pavement is typically designed to last the entire design period (e.g., 20 to 40 years) without intermittent rehabilitation activities. Asphalt pavements, however, are designed with planned periodic future rehabilitation activities in mind. This often results in concrete pavements being overdesigned with high initial costs, but lower rehabilitation costs. Conversely asphalt pavements have lower initial costs, but higher rehabilitation costs. Though life cycle cost can influence the pavement type selection, more often the final pavement selection is based on initial costs. This paper presents a model to optimize concrete pavement designs by balancing the initial costs of the pavement, which is primarily affected by the thickness and specific design features used, and the rehabilitation costs of the pavement based on the pavement's predicted performance using the recently adopted American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and its companion software, DARWin-ME.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Historically pavement designs have been based on an engineering analysis where the pavement thickness and features are chosen to meet the traffic, environmental, and subgrade conditions for the project. For concrete pavements, this means that the pavement is typically designed to last the entire design period (e.g., 20 to 40 years) without intermittent rehabilitation activities. Asphalt pavements, however, are designed with planned periodic future rehabilitation activities in mind. This often results in concrete pavements being overdesigned with high initial costs, but lower rehabilitation costs. Conversely asphalt pavements have lower initial costs, but higher rehabilitation costs. Though life cycle cost can influence the pavement type selection, more often the final pavement selection is based on initial costs. This paper presents a model to optimize concrete pavement designs by balancing the initial costs of the pavement, which is primarily affected by the thickness and specific design features used, and the rehabilitation costs of the pavement based on the pavement's predicted performance using the recently adopted American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and its companion software, DARWin-ME.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Historically pavement designs have been based on an engineering analysis where the pavement thickness and features are chosen to meet the traffic, environmental, and subgrade conditions for the project. For concrete pavements, this means that the pavement is typically designed to last the entire design period (e.g., 20 to 40 years) without intermittent rehabilitation activities. Asphalt pavements, however, are designed with planned periodic future rehabilitation activities in mind. This often results in concrete pavements being overdesigned with high initial costs, but lower rehabilitation costs. Conversely asphalt pavements have lower initial costs, but higher rehabilitation costs. Though life cycle cost can influence the pavement type selection, more often the final pavement selection is based on initial costs. This paper presents a model to optimize concrete pavement designs by balancing the initial costs of the pavement, which is primarily affected by the thickness and specific design features used, and the rehabilitation costs of the pavement based on the pavement's predicted performance using the recently adopted American Association of Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and its companion software, DARWin-ME.

Key concepts: Pavement engineering, Subgrade, Life-cycle cost analysis, Asphalt pavement, Transport engineering, Engineering, Civil engineering, Asphalt concrete

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Developing Optimized Concrete Pavement Designs Using the DARWin-ME / Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide and Cost Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens