PHYTOCHROME‐MEDIATED PHOTOTROPISM AND DIFFERENT DICHROIC ORIENTATION OF Pr AND Pfr IN PROTONEMATA OF THE FERN ADIANTUM CAPILLUS‐VENERIS L.
Akeo Kadota, Masamitsu Wada, Masaki Furuya
Abstract
Akeo Kadota, Masamitsu Wada, Masaki Furuya
Abstract
Abstract— Single‐celled protonemata of Adiantum capillus‐veneris were cultured under continuous red light for 6 days and then in the dark for 15 h. Brief local exposure of a flank (5 times 20 /mi) of the subapical region of a protonema to a microbeam of red light effectively induced a phototropic response toward the irradiated side. The degree of the response was dependent upon the fluence of the red light. Red/far‐red reversibility was typically observed in this photoreaction, showing that phytochrome was the photo‐receptive pigment. When the flank was irradiated with a microbeam of linearly polarized red and far‐red light, red light with an electrical vector parallel to the cell surface was most effective. However, the far‐red light effect was most prominent when its electrical vector was normal to the cell surface. These polarized light effects indicate the different dichroic orientation of Pr (red‐light‐absorbing form of phytochrome) and Pr (far‐red‐light‐absorbing form of phytochrome) at the cell flank.
OpenAlex reports 73 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract— Single‐celled protonemata of Adiantum capillus‐veneris were cultured under continuous red light for 6 days and then in the dark for 15 h. Brief local exposure of a flank (5 times 20 /mi) of the subapical region of a protonema to a microbeam of red light effectively induced a phototropic response toward the irradiated side. The degree of the response was dependent upon the fluence of the red light. Red/far‐red reversibility was typically observed in this photoreaction, showing that phytochrome was the photo‐receptive pigment. When the flank was irradiated with a microbeam of linearly polarized red and far‐red light, red light with an electrical vector parallel to the cell surface was most effective. However, the far‐red light effect was most prominent when its electrical vector was normal to the cell surface. These polarized light effects indicate the different dichroic orientation of Pr (red‐light‐absorbing form of phytochrome) and Pr (far‐red‐light‐absorbing form of phytochrome) at the cell flank.
Key concepts: Phytochrome, Protonema, Phototropism, Far-red, Red light, Biophysics, Apical cell, Fern