2004Statistics in MedicineRequires access

Playing safe and preserving integrity: making the FDA model work

Janet Wittes

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The proposed FDA model for Data Monitoring Committees (DMC) includes the recommendation to separate the reporting statistician from the co-ordinating centre statistician. The former writes reports for the DMC; the latter is the statistician responsible for the statistical design of the trial, its ongoing day-to-day operation, and the final analysis of the data. This model, while protecting the scientific integrity of the trial, risks producing inadequate reports to the DMC unless the reporting statistician understands the trial and the database. This brief paper describes methods by which the reporting statistician can gain the knowledge necessary to produce informative reports. It also emphasizes that reports produced for the purpose of making decisions during the course of a trial differ in purpose, and should therefore differ in form, from reports summarizing the data and results at the end of the trial.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The proposed FDA model for Data Monitoring Committees (DMC) includes the recommendation to separate the reporting statistician from the co-ordinating centre statistician. The former writes reports for the DMC; the latter is the statistician responsible for the statistical design of the trial, its ongoing day-to-day operation, and the final analysis of the data. This model, while protecting the scientific integrity of the trial, risks producing inadequate reports to the DMC unless the reporting statistician understands the trial and the database. This brief paper describes methods by which the reporting statistician can gain the knowledge necessary to produce informative reports. It also emphasizes that reports produced for the purpose of making decisions during the course of a trial differ in purpose, and should therefore differ in form, from reports summarizing the data and results at the end of the trial.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The proposed FDA model for Data Monitoring Committees (DMC) includes the recommendation to separate the reporting statistician from the co-ordinating centre statistician. The former writes reports for the DMC; the latter is the statistician responsible for the statistical design of the trial, its ongoing day-to-day operation, and the final analysis of the data. This model, while protecting the scientific integrity of the trial, risks producing inadequate reports to the DMC unless the reporting statistician understands the trial and the database. This brief paper describes methods by which the reporting statistician can gain the knowledge necessary to produce informative reports. It also emphasizes that reports produced for the purpose of making decisions during the course of a trial differ in purpose, and should therefore differ in form, from reports summarizing the data and results at the end of the trial.

Key concepts: Statistician, Computer science, Scientific integrity, Clinical trial, Work (physics), Data science, Risk analysis (engineering), Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Playing safe and preserving integrity: making the FDA model work — Research Paper | ScholarLens