1980Vascular SurgeryRequires access

Comparative Evaluation of Vascular Clamps on the Arteriosclerotic Aortic Walls

Susumu Masuoka, Akira Yokoyama, Tadao Shimomura, N. Kuromoto, Satoshi Kawai

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Seven different vascular clamps selected from among those in routine use in vascular surgery (Satinsky clamp, Satinsky rubber clamp, Fogarty clamp, Bull dog clamp, Bulldog rubber clamp, Potts clamp, and Potts rubber clamp) were applied to arteriosclerotic rabbit abdominal aortae to evaluate both grossly and histologically the relative degree of injury thus caused to the vessel wall at dif ferent levels of clamping pressure. Of the vascular clamps examined, the Satin sky clamp and the Fogarty clamp, followed by the Bulldog rubber clamp, proved to cause the least damage to the vessel wall. The Satinsky clamp and Fogarty clamp, in particular, appeared to be the most suitable for arterioscle rotic vessels. The Potts clamp, the Potts rubber clamp, and the Bulldog clamp, which were highly traumatic, should probably not be applied to peripheral or other small-sized blood vessels.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seven different vascular clamps selected from among those in routine use in vascular surgery (Satinsky clamp, Satinsky rubber clamp, Fogarty clamp, Bull dog clamp, Bulldog rubber clamp, Potts clamp, and Potts rubber clamp) were applied to arteriosclerotic rabbit abdominal aortae to evaluate both grossly and histologically the relative degree of injury thus caused to the vessel wall at dif ferent levels of clamping pressure. Of the vascular clamps examined, the Satin sky clamp and the Fogarty clamp, followed by the Bulldog rubber clamp, proved to cause the least damage to the vessel wall. The Satinsky clamp and Fogarty clamp, in particular, appeared to be the most suitable for arterioscle rotic vessels. The Potts clamp, the Potts rubber clamp, and the Bulldog clamp, which were highly traumatic, should probably not be applied to peripheral or other small-sized blood vessels.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seven different vascular clamps selected from among those in routine use in vascular surgery (Satinsky clamp, Satinsky rubber clamp, Fogarty clamp, Bull dog clamp, Bulldog rubber clamp, Potts clamp, and Potts rubber clamp) were applied to arteriosclerotic rabbit abdominal aortae to evaluate both grossly and histologically the relative degree of injury thus caused to the vessel wall at dif ferent levels of clamping pressure. Of the vascular clamps examined, the Satin sky clamp and the Fogarty clamp, followed by the Bulldog rubber clamp, proved to cause the least damage to the vessel wall. The Satinsky clamp and Fogarty clamp, in particular, appeared to be the most suitable for arterioscle rotic vessels. The Potts clamp, the Potts rubber clamp, and the Bulldog clamp, which were highly traumatic, should probably not be applied to peripheral or other small-sized blood vessels.

Key concepts: Clamp, Medicine, Anatomy, Clamping, Surgery, Engineering, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Evaluation of Vascular Clamps on the Arteriosclerotic Aortic Walls — Research Paper | ScholarLens