2003Unpublished venueRequires access

The Amrozi Bali bombing case: is Indonesia's anti-terrorism law unconstitutional?

Angus Martyn, Parliamentary Library

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

On 8 August 2003, Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was found guilty of various charges relating to his purchase of the Minivan and bomb-making chemicals used in the Bali bombings of 12 October 2002. These charges were laid under an anti-terrorism regulation that was proclaimed by President Megawati one week after the Bali bombings. An initial appeal to the High Court against Amrozi's conviction was heard in September but the conviction was upheld. An appeal has now been lodged with the Supreme Court. One of the main grounds for appeal is that the anti-terrorism regulation breaches the prohibition against retrospective prosecution in Article 28I(1) of Indonesia's Constitution. This constitutional issue - outlined by Angus Martyn in this Research Note - will likely eventually be decided by the newly formed Constitutional Court.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On 8 August 2003, Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was found guilty of various charges relating to his purchase of the Minivan and bomb-making chemicals used in the Bali bombings of 12 October 2002. These charges were laid under an anti-terrorism regulation that was proclaimed by President Megawati one week after the Bali bombings. An initial appeal to the High Court against Amrozi's conviction was heard in September but the conviction was upheld. An appeal has now been lodged with the Supreme Court. One of the main grounds for appeal is that the anti-terrorism regulation breaches the prohibition against retrospective prosecution in Article 28I(1) of Indonesia's Constitution. This constitutional issue - outlined by Angus Martyn in this Research Note - will likely eventually be decided by the newly formed Constitutional Court.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On 8 August 2003, Amrozi bin Nurhasyim was found guilty of various charges relating to his purchase of the Minivan and bomb-making chemicals used in the Bali bombings of 12 October 2002. These charges were laid under an anti-terrorism regulation that was proclaimed by President Megawati one week after the Bali bombings. An initial appeal to the High Court against Amrozi's conviction was heard in September but the conviction was upheld. An appeal has now been lodged with the Supreme Court. One of the main grounds for appeal is that the anti-terrorism regulation breaches the prohibition against retrospective prosecution in Article 28I(1) of Indonesia's Constitution. This constitutional issue - outlined by Angus Martyn in this Research Note - will likely eventually be decided by the newly formed Constitutional Court.

Key concepts: Appeal, Conviction, Law, Terrorism, Political science, Constitution, Supreme court

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Amrozi Bali bombing case: is Indonesia's anti-terrorism law unconstitutional? — Research Paper | ScholarLens