1983Journal of Dairy ScienceOpen access

Cell Content of Goat Milk: California Mastitis Test, Coulter Counter, and Fossomatic for Predicting Half Infection

B. Poutrel, Catherine Lerondelle

Open full text 121 citations

Abstract

The mean cell count of goat milk collected in early and midlactation from udder halves free of infection was 1404 X 10(3) cells/ml and 614 X 10(3) cells/ml estimated by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic. Arithmetic means of cell count by Fossomatic method for samples within California Mastitis Test scores were similar to results from cow milk. Results by the three methods were closely correlated .7. Means of cell counts were 2858 X 10(3) cells/ml and 1293 X 10(3) cells/ml by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods for udder halves harboring coagulase-negative staphylococci and 8946 X 10(3) cells/ml and 4804 X 10(3) cells/ml for halves infected by major pathogens. Of the thresholds examined, 1000 X 10(3) cells/ml was most satisfactory for both Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods, because it detected about 80% of major infections and gave an acceptable proportion of errors.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The mean cell count of goat milk collected in early and midlactation from udder halves free of infection was 1404 X 10(3) cells/ml and 614 X 10(3) cells/ml estimated by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic. Arithmetic means of cell count by Fossomatic method for samples within California Mastitis Test scores were similar to results from cow milk. Results by the three methods were closely correlated .7. Means of cell counts were 2858 X 10(3) cells/ml and 1293 X 10(3) cells/ml by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods for udder halves harboring coagulase-negative staphylococci and 8946 X 10(3) cells/ml and 4804 X 10(3) cells/ml for halves infected by major pathogens. Of the thresholds examined, 1000 X 10(3) cells/ml was most satisfactory for both Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods, because it detected about 80% of major infections and gave an acceptable proportion of errors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 121 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The mean cell count of goat milk collected in early and midlactation from udder halves free of infection was 1404 X 10(3) cells/ml and 614 X 10(3) cells/ml estimated by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic. Arithmetic means of cell count by Fossomatic method for samples within California Mastitis Test scores were similar to results from cow milk. Results by the three methods were closely correlated .7. Means of cell counts were 2858 X 10(3) cells/ml and 1293 X 10(3) cells/ml by Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods for udder halves harboring coagulase-negative staphylococci and 8946 X 10(3) cells/ml and 4804 X 10(3) cells/ml for halves infected by major pathogens. Of the thresholds examined, 1000 X 10(3) cells/ml was most satisfactory for both Coulter Counter and Fossomatic methods, because it detected about 80% of major infections and gave an acceptable proportion of errors.

Key concepts: Coulter counter, Udder, Mastitis, Cell counting, California mastitis test, Somatic cell count, Veterinary medicine, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cell Content of Goat Milk: California Mastitis Test, Coulter Counter, and Fossomatic for Predicting Half Infection — Research Paper | ScholarLens