2011•Open Research (University of Surrey)Requires access

Is burst loss worse than random loss for video transmission

Jimin Xiao, Tammam Tillo, Chunyu Lin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Many papers have shown that burst loss causes more severe damage to the reconstructed video quality than random loss for the same packet loss rate. With traditional interleaving methods, the consecutive lost packet positions will be interleaved to random positions, and after interleaving, the PSNR of burst loss can be close to the PSNR of random loss for the same packet loss rate. In this paper, a novel slice reorder and packetization (SRP) approach is proposed which fully utilizes the temporal correlation between slices in successive frames. Theoretical analysis is presented that explains why with the proposed approach, burst loss can be better than random loss for the same packet loss rate. The effect of the proposed approach is validated with H.264/AVC coded video. The simulation results show that with the proposed approach, the PSNR of the burst loss can be up to more than 2dB higher than random loss without adding any redundant information.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many papers have shown that burst loss causes more severe damage to the reconstructed video quality than random loss for the same packet loss rate. With traditional interleaving methods, the consecutive lost packet positions will be interleaved to random positions, and after interleaving, the PSNR of burst loss can be close to the PSNR of random loss for the same packet loss rate. In this paper, a novel slice reorder and packetization (SRP) approach is proposed which fully utilizes the temporal correlation between slices in successive frames. Theoretical analysis is presented that explains why with the proposed approach, burst loss can be better than random loss for the same packet loss rate. The effect of the proposed approach is validated with H.264/AVC coded video. The simulation results show that with the proposed approach, the PSNR of the burst loss can be up to more than 2dB higher than random loss without adding any redundant information.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many papers have shown that burst loss causes more severe damage to the reconstructed video quality than random loss for the same packet loss rate. With traditional interleaving methods, the consecutive lost packet positions will be interleaved to random positions, and after interleaving, the PSNR of burst loss can be close to the PSNR of random loss for the same packet loss rate. In this paper, a novel slice reorder and packetization (SRP) approach is proposed which fully utilizes the temporal correlation between slices in successive frames. Theoretical analysis is presented that explains why with the proposed approach, burst loss can be better than random loss for the same packet loss rate. The effect of the proposed approach is validated with H.264/AVC coded video. The simulation results show that with the proposed approach, the PSNR of the burst loss can be up to more than 2dB higher than random loss without adding any redundant information.

Key concepts: Interleaving, Packet loss, Computer science, Data loss, Transmission loss, Real-time computing, Algorithm, Network packet

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is burst loss worse than random loss for video transmission — Research Paper | ScholarLens