1988Physiologia PlantarumRequires access

Phytochrome is not involved in the red‐light‐enhancement of the stomatal blue‐light‐response in wheat seedlings

Per Erik Karlsson

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

The stomatal response to blue light (BL) in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Starke II, Weibull) was enhanced by background red light (R). This enhancement was only slightly affected by the addition of background far‐red light (FR). Under similar light treatments, the addition of FR induced a 43% transformation from the far‐red‐absorbing form towards the red‐absorbing form of phytochrome from etiolated oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Sol II), immobilized on phenyl‐sepharose. Furthermore, the enhancement of the stomatal BL‐response by 15 min R was not reversed by a subsequent irradiation with 5 min FR. It is concluded that the red‐light‐enhancement of the stomatal blue‐light‐response in wheat seedlings does not involve a change in the photostationary state of phytochrome.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The stomatal response to blue light (BL) in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Starke II, Weibull) was enhanced by background red light (R). This enhancement was only slightly affected by the addition of background far‐red light (FR). Under similar light treatments, the addition of FR induced a 43% transformation from the far‐red‐absorbing form towards the red‐absorbing form of phytochrome from etiolated oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Sol II), immobilized on phenyl‐sepharose. Furthermore, the enhancement of the stomatal BL‐response by 15 min R was not reversed by a subsequent irradiation with 5 min FR. It is concluded that the red‐light‐enhancement of the stomatal blue‐light‐response in wheat seedlings does not involve a change in the photostationary state of phytochrome.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The stomatal response to blue light (BL) in wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Starke II, Weibull) was enhanced by background red light (R). This enhancement was only slightly affected by the addition of background far‐red light (FR). Under similar light treatments, the addition of FR induced a 43% transformation from the far‐red‐absorbing form towards the red‐absorbing form of phytochrome from etiolated oat (Avena sativa L. cv. Sol II), immobilized on phenyl‐sepharose. Furthermore, the enhancement of the stomatal BL‐response by 15 min R was not reversed by a subsequent irradiation with 5 min FR. It is concluded that the red‐light‐enhancement of the stomatal blue‐light‐response in wheat seedlings does not involve a change in the photostationary state of phytochrome.

Key concepts: Phytochrome, Avena, Red light, Blue light, Etiolation, Photostationary state, Botany, Far-red

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phytochrome is not involved in the red‐light‐enhancement of the stomatal blue‐light‐response in wheat seedlings — Research Paper | ScholarLens