2012Biomedical PapersOpen access

Effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension in relation to age and sex: Insights from the aspirant trial

J. Václavík, Richard Sedlák, Jiří Jarkovský, Eva Kociánová, Miloš Táborský

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are currently limited data on whether the effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension depends on age and sex. METHODS: Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (BP)>140 mmHg or diastolic BP>90 mmHg, despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (ASPIRANT). RESULTS: Analyses were done on 55 patients treated with spironolactone and 56 patients treated with placebo. Significant reductions of office systolic BP (-8.9±6.7 mmHg, P=0.012), 24-h ABPM systolic BP (-7.9±7.2 mmHg, P=0.032) and ABPM day-time systolic BP (-7.5±7.1 mmHg) after 8 weeks of spironolactone treatment, compared to placebo, were only observed in patients with a median age>62 years. The office and ABPM systolic BP reductions in patients aged ≤62 years and diastolic BP reductions by spironolactone in both age groups were not significant compared to placebo. Women tended to have a nonsignificantly higher reduction in systolic BP with spironolactone treatment, and there was no difference in diastolic BP reduction between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone only leads to a reduction of systolic BP in older patients with resistant arterial hypertension aged >62 years, and is effective to a similar extent in men and women.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: There are currently limited data on whether the effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension depends on age and sex. METHODS: Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (BP)>140 mmHg or diastolic BP>90 mmHg, despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (ASPIRANT). RESULTS: Analyses were done on 55 patients treated with spironolactone and 56 patients treated with placebo. Significant reductions of office systolic BP (-8.9±6.7 mmHg, P=0.012), 24-h ABPM systolic BP (-7.9±7.2 mmHg, P=0.032) and ABPM day-time systolic BP (-7.5±7.1 mmHg) after 8 weeks of spironolactone treatment, compared to placebo, were only observed in patients with a median age>62 years. The office and ABPM systolic BP reductions in patients aged ≤62 years and diastolic BP reductions by spironolactone in both age groups were not significant compared to placebo. Women tended to have a nonsignificantly higher reduction in systolic BP with spironolactone treatment, and there was no difference in diastolic BP reduction between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone only leads to a reduction of systolic BP in older patients with resistant arterial hypertension aged >62 years, and is effective to a similar extent in men and women.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: There are currently limited data on whether the effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension depends on age and sex. METHODS: Patients with an office systolic blood pressure (BP)>140 mmHg or diastolic BP>90 mmHg, despite treatment with at least 3 antihypertensive drugs including a diuretic, were randomly assigned to receive spironolactone or a placebo for 8 weeks in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial (ASPIRANT). RESULTS: Analyses were done on 55 patients treated with spironolactone and 56 patients treated with placebo. Significant reductions of office systolic BP (-8.9±6.7 mmHg, P=0.012), 24-h ABPM systolic BP (-7.9±7.2 mmHg, P=0.032) and ABPM day-time systolic BP (-7.5±7.1 mmHg) after 8 weeks of spironolactone treatment, compared to placebo, were only observed in patients with a median age>62 years. The office and ABPM systolic BP reductions in patients aged ≤62 years and diastolic BP reductions by spironolactone in both age groups were not significant compared to placebo. Women tended to have a nonsignificantly higher reduction in systolic BP with spironolactone treatment, and there was no difference in diastolic BP reduction between women and men. CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone only leads to a reduction of systolic BP in older patients with resistant arterial hypertension aged >62 years, and is effective to a similar extent in men and women.

Key concepts: Spironolactone, Medicine, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Aldosterone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of spironolactone in patients with resistant arterial hypertension in relation to age and sex: Insights from the aspirant trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens