2014Hydrological ProcessesRequires access

Canopy transpiration obtained from leaf transpiration, sap flow and FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method

Liwen Zhao, Wenzhi Zhao

Open publisher page 22 citations

Abstract

Abstract With a maize seed planting area of about 67 000 hm2, Zhangye city supplies the seeds for more than 40% of the maize planting area in China. Irrigation water is often overused to ensure the quality of the maize seeds, leading to serious water shortage problems in recent years. An accurate and convenient estimate of canopy transpiration is of particular importance to ease the problem. In this paper, leaf transpiration and sap flow in a maize field were measured in 2012 using a portable photosynthesis system and a heat balance sap flow system. Based on a large amount of meteorological data and relevant maize plant‐growing parameters, canopy transpiration was up‐scaled from both leaf transpiration (Tl) and sap flow (Tf), and also calculated by the FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method (T). Comparing these three types of transpiration, Tf was proved to be more reliable than Tl. Taking Tf as a benchmark, the basal crop coefficient (Kcb, the key parameter of FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method) was further adjusted and verified for the maize plants in this region. In addition, the errors when using up‐scaling methods and FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method are summarized. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract With a maize seed planting area of about 67 000 hm2, Zhangye city supplies the seeds for more than 40% of the maize planting area in China. Irrigation water is often overused to ensure the quality of the maize seeds, leading to serious water shortage problems in recent years. An accurate and convenient estimate of canopy transpiration is of particular importance to ease the problem. In this paper, leaf transpiration and sap flow in a maize field were measured in 2012 using a portable photosynthesis system and a heat balance sap flow system. Based on a large amount of meteorological data and relevant maize plant‐growing parameters, canopy transpiration was up‐scaled from both leaf transpiration (Tl) and sap flow (Tf), and also calculated by the FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method (T). Comparing these three types of transpiration, Tf was proved to be more reliable than Tl. Taking Tf as a benchmark, the basal crop coefficient (Kcb, the key parameter of FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method) was further adjusted and verified for the maize plants in this region. In addition, the errors when using up‐scaling methods and FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method are summarized. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 22 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract With a maize seed planting area of about 67 000 hm2, Zhangye city supplies the seeds for more than 40% of the maize planting area in China. Irrigation water is often overused to ensure the quality of the maize seeds, leading to serious water shortage problems in recent years. An accurate and convenient estimate of canopy transpiration is of particular importance to ease the problem. In this paper, leaf transpiration and sap flow in a maize field were measured in 2012 using a portable photosynthesis system and a heat balance sap flow system. Based on a large amount of meteorological data and relevant maize plant‐growing parameters, canopy transpiration was up‐scaled from both leaf transpiration (Tl) and sap flow (Tf), and also calculated by the FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method (T). Comparing these three types of transpiration, Tf was proved to be more reliable than Tl. Taking Tf as a benchmark, the basal crop coefficient (Kcb, the key parameter of FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method) was further adjusted and verified for the maize plants in this region. In addition, the errors when using up‐scaling methods and FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method are summarized. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Key concepts: Transpiration, Crop coefficient, Canopy, Environmental science, Sowing, Irrigation, Agronomy, Crop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Canopy transpiration obtained from leaf transpiration, sap flow and FAO‐56 dual crop coefficient method — Research Paper | ScholarLens