Michael A. Peters
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper is an attempt to work through my own angst at a negative review of my Education, Philosophy and Politics, reviewed recently by Ian Stronach for the British Educational Research Journal, and to provide a therapeutic reading of the ethics of negative reviews. What of ‘shots in the dark’ and should there be a right of reply?
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper is an attempt to work through my own angst at a negative review of my Education, Philosophy and Politics, reviewed recently by Ian Stronach for the British Educational Research Journal, and to provide a therapeutic reading of the ethics of negative reviews. What of ‘shots in the dark’ and should there be a right of reply?
Key concepts: Criticism, Reading (process), Politics, Sociology, Critical reading, Epistemology, Psychoanalysis, Social science