1998Seminars in NeurologyRequires access

Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

David C. Anderson

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation, with a prevalence of 6% in those over 65 years, is responsible for 75-100 x 10(3) strokes each year in the United States. These strokes are more severe and have less favorable long-term prognosis than strokes due to other mechanisms. Modern trials show that warfarin reduces stroke rate by about 70% and aspirin by about 20%. Although average annual stroke rate among atrial fibrillation patients is about 4-5%, considerable risk heterogeneity exists. The goal of risk stratification is to differentiate patients with risk high enough to justify warfarin from those whose risk is so low that they are better off on aspirin or even no antithrombotic therapy. Ideal antithrombotic therapy is individualized, balancing risks of thromboembolism versus bleeding on antithrombotic therapy, and considering patient preferences. Although the science has advanced significantly in the past decade, application has lagged behind. Much benefit will potentially accrue from broad education efforts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Atrial fibrillation, with a prevalence of 6% in those over 65 years, is responsible for 75-100 x 10(3) strokes each year in the United States. These strokes are more severe and have less favorable long-term prognosis than strokes due to other mechanisms. Modern trials show that warfarin reduces stroke rate by about 70% and aspirin by about 20%. Although average annual stroke rate among atrial fibrillation patients is about 4-5%, considerable risk heterogeneity exists. The goal of risk stratification is to differentiate patients with risk high enough to justify warfarin from those whose risk is so low that they are better off on aspirin or even no antithrombotic therapy. Ideal antithrombotic therapy is individualized, balancing risks of thromboembolism versus bleeding on antithrombotic therapy, and considering patient preferences. Although the science has advanced significantly in the past decade, application has lagged behind. Much benefit will potentially accrue from broad education efforts.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Atrial fibrillation, with a prevalence of 6% in those over 65 years, is responsible for 75-100 x 10(3) strokes each year in the United States. These strokes are more severe and have less favorable long-term prognosis than strokes due to other mechanisms. Modern trials show that warfarin reduces stroke rate by about 70% and aspirin by about 20%. Although average annual stroke rate among atrial fibrillation patients is about 4-5%, considerable risk heterogeneity exists. The goal of risk stratification is to differentiate patients with risk high enough to justify warfarin from those whose risk is so low that they are better off on aspirin or even no antithrombotic therapy. Ideal antithrombotic therapy is individualized, balancing risks of thromboembolism versus bleeding on antithrombotic therapy, and considering patient preferences. Although the science has advanced significantly in the past decade, application has lagged behind. Much benefit will potentially accrue from broad education efforts.

Key concepts: Medicine, Antithrombotic, Atrial fibrillation, Aspirin, Warfarin, Stroke (engine), Stroke risk, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation — Research Paper | ScholarLens