Rawls and Rousseau on the Social Contract
Joseph M. Grcic
Abstract
Open-access reader
Joseph M. Grcic
Abstract
Open-access reader
In his A Theory of Justice, John Rawls claims his social contract theory can be considered part of the social contract tradition which includes Locke, Rousseau and Kant. 1 The purpose of this essay is to determine what defines a tradition such as that of the social contract and to evaluate Rawls' claim that he is in the same tradition as Rousseau. At the same time, I analyze the general nature of the contract model and so clarify some of the controversial points in Rawls' and Rousseau'8 political theories.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In his A Theory of Justice, John Rawls claims his social contract theory can be considered part of the social contract tradition which includes Locke, Rousseau and Kant. 1 The purpose of this essay is to determine what defines a tradition such as that of the social contract and to evaluate Rawls' claim that he is in the same tradition as Rousseau. At the same time, I analyze the general nature of the contract model and so clarify some of the controversial points in Rawls' and Rousseau'8 political theories.
Key concepts: Social contract, Law and economics, Sociology, Philosophy, Epistemology, Political science, Law, Politics