1964•Unpublished venueRequires access

Anomaly Selection for Deflection Interpolation Part 2. Practical Application

William E. Strange, Geoffrey Woollard

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract : The Test Phase utilized three astro-geodetic deflection stations in the Rocky Mountain area of the western United States. These were deflection stations 102, 105, and 116 from USC+GS Special Publication No. 229. Using the adopted procedure, the Xi deflection component was interpolated between stations 105 and 116 to obtain an interpolated Xi value at station 102. A comparison of this interpolated Xi value with the astro-geodetic Xi value showed that the two differed by only .22 in. Since the accuracy of the astrogeodetic values probably do not exceed =.2 in., the results were considered highly satisfactory. The Application Phase pursued deflection interpolation in an area in the Alps chosen by ACIC. In this case three deflection stations were chosen from a deflection of the vertical map provided by ACIC. These were designated stations 1, 2, and 3 for convenience. Using the adopted procedure, the eta deflection component was interpolated between stations 1 and 3 to obtain a value at station 2. As there were no individual deflection values given, the astro-geodetic deflections were estimated from a eta deflection component contour map with a 2.50 in. contour interval. Because of the manner of obtaining the astro-geodetic deflections, they are considered to have an accuracy of the order of =.5 in.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract : The Test Phase utilized three astro-geodetic deflection stations in the Rocky Mountain area of the western United States. These were deflection stations 102, 105, and 116 from USC+GS Special Publication No. 229. Using the adopted procedure, the Xi deflection component was interpolated between stations 105 and 116 to obtain an interpolated Xi value at station 102. A comparison of this interpolated Xi value with the astro-geodetic Xi value showed that the two differed by only .22 in. Since the accuracy of the astrogeodetic values probably do not exceed =.2 in., the results were considered highly satisfactory. The Application Phase pursued deflection interpolation in an area in the Alps chosen by ACIC. In this case three deflection stations were chosen from a deflection of the vertical map provided by ACIC. These were designated stations 1, 2, and 3 for convenience. Using the adopted procedure, the eta deflection component was interpolated between stations 1 and 3 to obtain a value at station 2. As there were no individual deflection values given, the astro-geodetic deflections were estimated from a eta deflection component contour map with a 2.50 in. contour interval. Because of the manner of obtaining the astro-geodetic deflections, they are considered to have an accuracy of the order of =.5 in.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract : The Test Phase utilized three astro-geodetic deflection stations in the Rocky Mountain area of the western United States. These were deflection stations 102, 105, and 116 from USC+GS Special Publication No. 229. Using the adopted procedure, the Xi deflection component was interpolated between stations 105 and 116 to obtain an interpolated Xi value at station 102. A comparison of this interpolated Xi value with the astro-geodetic Xi value showed that the two differed by only .22 in. Since the accuracy of the astrogeodetic values probably do not exceed =.2 in., the results were considered highly satisfactory. The Application Phase pursued deflection interpolation in an area in the Alps chosen by ACIC. In this case three deflection stations were chosen from a deflection of the vertical map provided by ACIC. These were designated stations 1, 2, and 3 for convenience. Using the adopted procedure, the eta deflection component was interpolated between stations 1 and 3 to obtain a value at station 2. As there were no individual deflection values given, the astro-geodetic deflections were estimated from a eta deflection component contour map with a 2.50 in. contour interval. Because of the manner of obtaining the astro-geodetic deflections, they are considered to have an accuracy of the order of =.5 in.

Key concepts: Selection (genetic algorithm), Interpolation (computer graphics), Computer science, Deflection (physics), Anomaly (physics), Anomaly detection, Geology, Data mining

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anomaly Selection for Deflection Interpolation Part 2. Practical Application — Research Paper | ScholarLens