Cardiac surgery patients present considerable variation in pre‐operative hemodynamic variables
Erik Sloth, Christian Lindskov, Anne-Grethe Lorentzen, Marie H. Nygaard, H. H. Kure, Carl-Johan Jakobsen
Abstract
Erik Sloth, Christian Lindskov, Anne-Grethe Lorentzen, Marie H. Nygaard, H. H. Kure, Carl-Johan Jakobsen
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is essential to control hemodynamics in cardiac surgery. Patients are often monitored extensively in order to optimize hemodynamic performance. However, pre-operative values are normally unknown. Furthermore, hemodynamic goals may seem arbitrary and the lack of an evidence-based consensus may lead to both under- and over-treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variables most commonly used for hemodynamic guidance in the post-operative period. METHODS: Ten patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were followed with invasive hemodynamic monitoring the night before surgery. All data were recorded automatically and electronically. RESULTS: We found considerable inter-patient differences and intra-patient variation. The greatest intra-patient variation was found in the cardiac index (CI), ranging from 1.9 to 5.3 l/min/m(2). Four patients had periodic CI <2.4 l/min/m(2). Eight patients showed SpO2 values < or =92, four of them in more than 15% of the observations. Six patients had an SvO2 <70% in more than 40% of the observations and two an SvO2 < 64% in more than 20% of the observations. CONCLUSIONS: This study is unique because hemodynamic reference data in cardiac surgery patients have not been published previously. The intra-patient variations were unexpectedly high in most hemodynamic variables and demonstrate the difficulties of using hemodynamic parameters as a guidance for treatment and indicate that goal-oriented therapy using currently accepted values may result in over-treatment in some patients.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: It is essential to control hemodynamics in cardiac surgery. Patients are often monitored extensively in order to optimize hemodynamic performance. However, pre-operative values are normally unknown. Furthermore, hemodynamic goals may seem arbitrary and the lack of an evidence-based consensus may lead to both under- and over-treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the variables most commonly used for hemodynamic guidance in the post-operative period. METHODS: Ten patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery were followed with invasive hemodynamic monitoring the night before surgery. All data were recorded automatically and electronically. RESULTS: We found considerable inter-patient differences and intra-patient variation. The greatest intra-patient variation was found in the cardiac index (CI), ranging from 1.9 to 5.3 l/min/m(2). Four patients had periodic CI <2.4 l/min/m(2). Eight patients showed SpO2 values < or =92, four of them in more than 15% of the observations. Six patients had an SvO2 <70% in more than 40% of the observations and two an SvO2 < 64% in more than 20% of the observations. CONCLUSIONS: This study is unique because hemodynamic reference data in cardiac surgery patients have not been published previously. The intra-patient variations were unexpectedly high in most hemodynamic variables and demonstrate the difficulties of using hemodynamic parameters as a guidance for treatment and indicate that goal-oriented therapy using currently accepted values may result in over-treatment in some patients.
Key concepts: Hemodynamics, Medicine, Cardiac index, Cardiac surgery, Anesthesia, Cardiac output, Surgery, Internal medicine