Household abandonment among sedentary Plains societies: behavioral sequences and consequences in the interpretation of the archaeological record
Robert L. Brooks
Abstract
Robert L. Brooks
Abstract
Introduction Since at least the early 1970s, archaeologists have studied abandonment processes and their effect on the archaeological record (Schiffer 1976:88). Initially, concerns were with de facto refuse and curation practices as part of the abandonment process. More recently, archaeology has witnessed an intensification and diversification in the study of this phenomenon. Archaeological investigations have been directed at differences in planned vs. unplanned abandonment (Brooks 1989) and utilization of sites from initial occupation to abandonment (Binford 1982; Stevenson 1982), while ethnoarchaeological research has focused on the nature of the abandonment process (cf. Kent 1988; Stevenson 1985; Tomka 1989). Three fundamental concepts regarding abandonment have arisen from this research. First, differences can be drawn in the nature of the abandonment process; Tomka (1989) has distinguished between episodic, seasonal, and permanent abandonment. Second, abandonment processes operate at the settlement, aggregate, and individual household level. Third, abandonment activities do not always represent orderly planned events; they may be unplanned because of either natural or cultural forces. These considerations can be viewed as a matrix of abandonment functions (Fig. 14.1) From another perspective the process of abandonment cannot be viewed as a separate, static event. It is always dynamically linked to other events through a structure of behavioral activities. For example, abandonment of an individual household because of deterioration is usually tied in some fashion to construction of a new residence. This paper explores household abandonment processes found among sedentary Native American societies in the Great Plains region of the United States.
OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Introduction Since at least the early 1970s, archaeologists have studied abandonment processes and their effect on the archaeological record (Schiffer 1976:88). Initially, concerns were with de facto refuse and curation practices as part of the abandonment process. More recently, archaeology has witnessed an intensification and diversification in the study of this phenomenon. Archaeological investigations have been directed at differences in planned vs. unplanned abandonment (Brooks 1989) and utilization of sites from initial occupation to abandonment (Binford 1982; Stevenson 1982), while ethnoarchaeological research has focused on the nature of the abandonment process (cf. Kent 1988; Stevenson 1985; Tomka 1989). Three fundamental concepts regarding abandonment have arisen from this research. First, differences can be drawn in the nature of the abandonment process; Tomka (1989) has distinguished between episodic, seasonal, and permanent abandonment. Second, abandonment processes operate at the settlement, aggregate, and individual household level. Third, abandonment activities do not always represent orderly planned events; they may be unplanned because of either natural or cultural forces. These considerations can be viewed as a matrix of abandonment functions (Fig. 14.1) From another perspective the process of abandonment cannot be viewed as a separate, static event. It is always dynamically linked to other events through a structure of behavioral activities. For example, abandonment of an individual household because of deterioration is usually tied in some fashion to construction of a new residence. This paper explores household abandonment processes found among sedentary Native American societies in the Great Plains region of the United States.
Key concepts: Abandonment (legal), Archaeology, Diversification (marketing strategy), Archaeological record, History, De facto, Geography, Interpretation (philosophy)