2006•Current Medical Research and OpinionRequires access

The onset of effect for escitalopram and its relevance for the clinical management of depression

Alan G. Wade, Henning Friis Andersen

Open publisher page 47 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the significance of 'onset of effect' on clinical outcome in the treatment of depression and the contribution of individual Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) items to improvements in the MADRS total score. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: All five published placebo-controlled clinical studies in depression as per January 1, 2005, with escitalopram, were included in this pooled analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1636 patients who were randomised to either escitalopram (882) or placebo (754), 1333 completed 8 weeks of treatment (707 escitalopram and 626 placebo). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the MADRS total score responses of escitalopram and placebo treatments was observed at week 1. All 10 MADRS single items showed a significant treatment effect at week 8. For items representing core symptoms of depression (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, concentration difficulties, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts) the effect was detected early (week 1) and for other items (reduced sleep, reduced appetite and lassitude) the effect was detected later (week 6-8). Of the patients who showed an onset of effect (> or = 20% reduction in MADRS) after 2 weeks, and who remained on escitalopram until week 8, 63% were in remission at week 8 (mean MADRS score of 6.1). CONCLUSION: Onset of treatment response at 2 weeks is an important indicator of subsequent remission at 8 weeks. It would therefore be a reasonable clinical recommendation that if patients fail to show a measurable clinical improvement within 2 weeks, a dose increase should be considered at this time.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the significance of 'onset of effect' on clinical outcome in the treatment of depression and the contribution of individual Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) items to improvements in the MADRS total score. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: All five published placebo-controlled clinical studies in depression as per January 1, 2005, with escitalopram, were included in this pooled analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1636 patients who were randomised to either escitalopram (882) or placebo (754), 1333 completed 8 weeks of treatment (707 escitalopram and 626 placebo). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the MADRS total score responses of escitalopram and placebo treatments was observed at week 1. All 10 MADRS single items showed a significant treatment effect at week 8. For items representing core symptoms of depression (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, concentration difficulties, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts) the effect was detected early (week 1) and for other items (reduced sleep, reduced appetite and lassitude) the effect was detected later (week 6-8). Of the patients who showed an onset of effect (> or = 20% reduction in MADRS) after 2 weeks, and who remained on escitalopram until week 8, 63% were in remission at week 8 (mean MADRS score of 6.1). CONCLUSION: Onset of treatment response at 2 weeks is an important indicator of subsequent remission at 8 weeks. It would therefore be a reasonable clinical recommendation that if patients fail to show a measurable clinical improvement within 2 weeks, a dose increase should be considered at this time.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 47 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the significance of 'onset of effect' on clinical outcome in the treatment of depression and the contribution of individual Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) items to improvements in the MADRS total score. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD: All five published placebo-controlled clinical studies in depression as per January 1, 2005, with escitalopram, were included in this pooled analysis. RESULTS: Of the 1636 patients who were randomised to either escitalopram (882) or placebo (754), 1333 completed 8 weeks of treatment (707 escitalopram and 626 placebo). A statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the MADRS total score responses of escitalopram and placebo treatments was observed at week 1. All 10 MADRS single items showed a significant treatment effect at week 8. For items representing core symptoms of depression (apparent sadness, reported sadness, inner tension, concentration difficulties, inability to feel, pessimistic thoughts and suicidal thoughts) the effect was detected early (week 1) and for other items (reduced sleep, reduced appetite and lassitude) the effect was detected later (week 6-8). Of the patients who showed an onset of effect (> or = 20% reduction in MADRS) after 2 weeks, and who remained on escitalopram until week 8, 63% were in remission at week 8 (mean MADRS score of 6.1). CONCLUSION: Onset of treatment response at 2 weeks is an important indicator of subsequent remission at 8 weeks. It would therefore be a reasonable clinical recommendation that if patients fail to show a measurable clinical improvement within 2 weeks, a dose increase should be considered at this time.

Key concepts: Escitalopram, Placebo, Medicine, Depression (economics), Internal medicine, Rating scale, Clinical significance, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The onset of effect for escitalopram and its relevance for the clinical management of depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens