Word-Edge Consonant Clusters in Chaha
Jin-young Tak
Abstract
Jin-young Tak
Abstract
The present study analyzes various patterns of [?]-epenthesis toward word-initial and -final consonant clusters in Chaha within the framework of the syllable margin approach (Baertsch 2002, Baertsch & Davis 2003). Following Banksira (1997, 2000) and Rose (1997, 2000), this paper posits that /β/ is a sonorant in Chaha. However, in contrast to Banksira (2000) who assigns the same sonority value to /β/ as nasals and liquids and Rose (2000) who locates /β/ between nasals and liquids in the sonority scale, it is argued here that in fact in Chaha /β/is less sonorant than both nasals and liquids. Furthermore, compared to Roses (2003) analysis where the constraint SyllabeContact places a crucial role in determining [?]-epenthesis in Chaha, the present analysis splits consonants within the syllable into two types of margin consonants (M1 and M2). Then, it is proposed that the separate M1 and M2 hierarchies enable us to account for the different behaviors of consonant clusters with respect to [?]-epenthesis without referring to an external sonority scale or a specific syllable contact conditions (Murray & Tennemann 1983).
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The present study analyzes various patterns of [?]-epenthesis toward word-initial and -final consonant clusters in Chaha within the framework of the syllable margin approach (Baertsch 2002, Baertsch & Davis 2003). Following Banksira (1997, 2000) and Rose (1997, 2000), this paper posits that /β/ is a sonorant in Chaha. However, in contrast to Banksira (2000) who assigns the same sonority value to /β/ as nasals and liquids and Rose (2000) who locates /β/ between nasals and liquids in the sonority scale, it is argued here that in fact in Chaha /β/is less sonorant than both nasals and liquids. Furthermore, compared to Roses (2003) analysis where the constraint SyllabeContact places a crucial role in determining [?]-epenthesis in Chaha, the present analysis splits consonants within the syllable into two types of margin consonants (M1 and M2). Then, it is proposed that the separate M1 and M2 hierarchies enable us to account for the different behaviors of consonant clusters with respect to [?]-epenthesis without referring to an external sonority scale or a specific syllable contact conditions (Murray & Tennemann 1983).
Key concepts: Sonority hierarchy, Syllable, Consonant, Consonant cluster, Obstruent, Linguistics, Mathematics, Speech recognition