2005South Asia Economic JournalRequires access

Economic Growth, Appropriate Policies and Poverty Reduction in a Developing Country

Tulus Tambunan

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

This article attempts to analyse the impact of economic growth on poverty reduction in Indonesia during the New Order (NO) era (1966–98). It also discusses the need of ‘anti-poverty’ versus ‘pro-poor development’ policies and programmes for poverty reduction. The paper addresses some long-standing questions in development economics. First, does data from Indonesia support the notion that growth is good for the poor? Second, does growth in agriculture matter for poverty reduction? Third, which one was the most responsible for the significant decline in poverty during the NO era: ‘anti-poverty’ or ‘pro-poor development’ policies? Through simple statistical analyses, the study shows that economic growth is positively correlated with poverty reduction, and the output or income growth in agriculture appears to have the strongest effect on poverty reduction than other sectors. This finding suggests and supports the general notion that the agricultural growth is essential for poverty reduction. This study also concludes that ‘anti-poverty’ programmes have been of minor importance in alleviating poverty compared with macroeconomic performance accompanied by ‘pro-poor development’ policies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article attempts to analyse the impact of economic growth on poverty reduction in Indonesia during the New Order (NO) era (1966–98). It also discusses the need of ‘anti-poverty’ versus ‘pro-poor development’ policies and programmes for poverty reduction. The paper addresses some long-standing questions in development economics. First, does data from Indonesia support the notion that growth is good for the poor? Second, does growth in agriculture matter for poverty reduction? Third, which one was the most responsible for the significant decline in poverty during the NO era: ‘anti-poverty’ or ‘pro-poor development’ policies? Through simple statistical analyses, the study shows that economic growth is positively correlated with poverty reduction, and the output or income growth in agriculture appears to have the strongest effect on poverty reduction than other sectors. This finding suggests and supports the general notion that the agricultural growth is essential for poverty reduction. This study also concludes that ‘anti-poverty’ programmes have been of minor importance in alleviating poverty compared with macroeconomic performance accompanied by ‘pro-poor development’ policies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article attempts to analyse the impact of economic growth on poverty reduction in Indonesia during the New Order (NO) era (1966–98). It also discusses the need of ‘anti-poverty’ versus ‘pro-poor development’ policies and programmes for poverty reduction. The paper addresses some long-standing questions in development economics. First, does data from Indonesia support the notion that growth is good for the poor? Second, does growth in agriculture matter for poverty reduction? Third, which one was the most responsible for the significant decline in poverty during the NO era: ‘anti-poverty’ or ‘pro-poor development’ policies? Through simple statistical analyses, the study shows that economic growth is positively correlated with poverty reduction, and the output or income growth in agriculture appears to have the strongest effect on poverty reduction than other sectors. This finding suggests and supports the general notion that the agricultural growth is essential for poverty reduction. This study also concludes that ‘anti-poverty’ programmes have been of minor importance in alleviating poverty compared with macroeconomic performance accompanied by ‘pro-poor development’ policies.

Key concepts: Poverty, Poverty reduction, Economics, Development economics, Agriculture, Basic needs, Culture of poverty, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic Growth, Appropriate Policies and Poverty Reduction in a Developing Country — Research Paper | ScholarLens