2012CrystEngCommRequires access

Screening for cocrystals of succinic acid and 4-aminobenzoic acid

Nizar Issa, Sarah A. Barnett, Sharmarke Mohamed, Doris Elfriede Braun, Royston C. B. Copley, Derek A. Tocher, Sarah L. Price

Open publisher page 54 citations

Abstract

The ability of the pharmaceutically acceptable cocrystallising agents, succinic acid and 4-aminobenzoic acid, to form cocrystals with ten small organic molecules with hydrogen bonding acceptors but no donors, was investigated by grinding, hot-stage microscopy and solution based crystallisation experiments. The reproducible results obtained by different methods showed that only six cocrystals formed. The crystal structures of the four novel cocrystals, succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine (1 : 1, P21/c, I), succinic acid·diphenylcyclopropenone (1 : 2, P21/c, II), 4-aminobenzoic acid·antipyrine (1 : 1, P21, III) and 4-aminobenzoic acid·phenazine (1 : 2, P, IV), are reported. The computed crystal energy landscapes of the cocrystals and their components show why succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene did not form a cocrystal as well as predicting the observed structure of succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine as the most stable. The most stable hypothetical structures of a 1 : 1 succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene cocrystal are closely related to those of the components. The results demonstrate that cocrystal formation requires both hydrogen bonding and close packing, and so markedly non-planar pharmaceuticals will be quite specific in the steric and hydrogen bonding disposition requirement of coformers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ability of the pharmaceutically acceptable cocrystallising agents, succinic acid and 4-aminobenzoic acid, to form cocrystals with ten small organic molecules with hydrogen bonding acceptors but no donors, was investigated by grinding, hot-stage microscopy and solution based crystallisation experiments. The reproducible results obtained by different methods showed that only six cocrystals formed. The crystal structures of the four novel cocrystals, succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine (1 : 1, P21/c, I), succinic acid·diphenylcyclopropenone (1 : 2, P21/c, II), 4-aminobenzoic acid·antipyrine (1 : 1, P21, III) and 4-aminobenzoic acid·phenazine (1 : 2, P, IV), are reported. The computed crystal energy landscapes of the cocrystals and their components show why succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene did not form a cocrystal as well as predicting the observed structure of succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine as the most stable. The most stable hypothetical structures of a 1 : 1 succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene cocrystal are closely related to those of the components. The results demonstrate that cocrystal formation requires both hydrogen bonding and close packing, and so markedly non-planar pharmaceuticals will be quite specific in the steric and hydrogen bonding disposition requirement of coformers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 54 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ability of the pharmaceutically acceptable cocrystallising agents, succinic acid and 4-aminobenzoic acid, to form cocrystals with ten small organic molecules with hydrogen bonding acceptors but no donors, was investigated by grinding, hot-stage microscopy and solution based crystallisation experiments. The reproducible results obtained by different methods showed that only six cocrystals formed. The crystal structures of the four novel cocrystals, succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine (1 : 1, P21/c, I), succinic acid·diphenylcyclopropenone (1 : 2, P21/c, II), 4-aminobenzoic acid·antipyrine (1 : 1, P21, III) and 4-aminobenzoic acid·phenazine (1 : 2, P, IV), are reported. The computed crystal energy landscapes of the cocrystals and their components show why succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene did not form a cocrystal as well as predicting the observed structure of succinic acid·2,2′-bipyridine as the most stable. The most stable hypothetical structures of a 1 : 1 succinic acid·1,4-dicyanobenzene cocrystal are closely related to those of the components. The results demonstrate that cocrystal formation requires both hydrogen bonding and close packing, and so markedly non-planar pharmaceuticals will be quite specific in the steric and hydrogen bonding disposition requirement of coformers.

Key concepts: Cocrystal, Succinic acid, Hydrogen bond, Chemistry, Dicarboxylic acid, Steric effects, Crystal engineering, Crystallography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Screening for cocrystals of succinic acid and 4-aminobenzoic acid — Research Paper | ScholarLens