2002Unpublished venueRequires access

Map projections and airborne moving map displays

Harmon Thomas

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The author discusses advantages and disadvantages of several methods of map projection, and identifies two methods that work well at any latitude with any map orientation. Four methods of map projection are discussed: cylindrical equidistant projection, sinusoidal projection, oblique orthographic projection, and oblique azimuthal equidistant projection. There are two modes of map displays, plan mode and map mode. Most of the discussion applies to the plan mode. For most applications, the projection of choice is orthographic projection. For maps of small areas with many target points, however, the cylindrical projection may be preferred due to computational requirements. For airborne maps with very long flight segments, the increased distance accuracy may make the azimuthal projections desirable. When properly implemented, the computational requirements of the orthographic and azimuthal projections are not significantly different.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author discusses advantages and disadvantages of several methods of map projection, and identifies two methods that work well at any latitude with any map orientation. Four methods of map projection are discussed: cylindrical equidistant projection, sinusoidal projection, oblique orthographic projection, and oblique azimuthal equidistant projection. There are two modes of map displays, plan mode and map mode. Most of the discussion applies to the plan mode. For most applications, the projection of choice is orthographic projection. For maps of small areas with many target points, however, the cylindrical projection may be preferred due to computational requirements. For airborne maps with very long flight segments, the increased distance accuracy may make the azimuthal projections desirable. When properly implemented, the computational requirements of the orthographic and azimuthal projections are not significantly different.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author discusses advantages and disadvantages of several methods of map projection, and identifies two methods that work well at any latitude with any map orientation. Four methods of map projection are discussed: cylindrical equidistant projection, sinusoidal projection, oblique orthographic projection, and oblique azimuthal equidistant projection. There are two modes of map displays, plan mode and map mode. Most of the discussion applies to the plan mode. For most applications, the projection of choice is orthographic projection. For maps of small areas with many target points, however, the cylindrical projection may be preferred due to computational requirements. For airborne maps with very long flight segments, the increased distance accuracy may make the azimuthal projections desirable. When properly implemented, the computational requirements of the orthographic and azimuthal projections are not significantly different.>

Key concepts: Projection (relational algebra), Map projection, Orthographic projection, Oblique projection, Azimuth, Equidistant, Projection plane, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Map projections and airborne moving map displays — Research Paper | ScholarLens