2008•Nigerian Journal of ParasitologyRequires access

Species\' identification of Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes and its epidemiological implications in Yola, Nigeria

N F Umaru, Oladele Akogun, C I Owuama

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Indoor and outdoor bites' collections of gravid Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes were made with plastic aspirator from residential areas within Jimeta-Yola metropolis for three years (between March and May; August and October 2003 to 2005). They were identified using standard morphological keys and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The identification results of the dry season collections of Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes using morphological keys were Anopheles gambiae complex (64.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (17.0 %), Anopheles pharoensis (9.0 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (5.0%); Culex quinquefasciatus (40.5 %), Culex pipiens fatigans (32.4 %) and Culex tigripes (10.1 %). The results of the wet season collections were Anopheles gambiae complex (56.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (19.6.0 %) Anopheles pharoensis (11.4 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (7.0 %); others (4.0 %). There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of different species of Culex mosquitoes due to changes in season, except Culex pipiens fatigans (36.4 %) and Culex tigripes (12.4 %). Results of the PCR identifications confirmed that Anopheles gambiae complex consisted of Anopheles arabiensis (66.7%) and Anopheles gambiae s.s.(6.7%). The study shows that Anopheles and Culex mosquito species abound in the study area with potential health consequences in the transmission of malaria and filariasis all year round. Keywords: gravid, Anopheles, Culex, identification, PCR. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology Vol. 28 (2) 2007: pp. 114-117

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Indoor and outdoor bites' collections of gravid Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes were made with plastic aspirator from residential areas within Jimeta-Yola metropolis for three years (between March and May; August and October 2003 to 2005). They were identified using standard morphological keys and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The identification results of the dry season collections of Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes using morphological keys were Anopheles gambiae complex (64.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (17.0 %), Anopheles pharoensis (9.0 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (5.0%); Culex quinquefasciatus (40.5 %), Culex pipiens fatigans (32.4 %) and Culex tigripes (10.1 %). The results of the wet season collections were Anopheles gambiae complex (56.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (19.6.0 %) Anopheles pharoensis (11.4 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (7.0 %); others (4.0 %). There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of different species of Culex mosquitoes due to changes in season, except Culex pipiens fatigans (36.4 %) and Culex tigripes (12.4 %). Results of the PCR identifications confirmed that Anopheles gambiae complex consisted of Anopheles arabiensis (66.7%) and Anopheles gambiae s.s.(6.7%). The study shows that Anopheles and Culex mosquito species abound in the study area with potential health consequences in the transmission of malaria and filariasis all year round. Keywords: gravid, Anopheles, Culex, identification, PCR. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology Vol. 28 (2) 2007: pp. 114-117

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Indoor and outdoor bites' collections of gravid Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes were made with plastic aspirator from residential areas within Jimeta-Yola metropolis for three years (between March and May; August and October 2003 to 2005). They were identified using standard morphological keys and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The identification results of the dry season collections of Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes using morphological keys were Anopheles gambiae complex (64.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (17.0 %), Anopheles pharoensis (9.0 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (5.0%); Culex quinquefasciatus (40.5 %), Culex pipiens fatigans (32.4 %) and Culex tigripes (10.1 %). The results of the wet season collections were Anopheles gambiae complex (56.0 %), Anopheles funestus complex (19.6.0 %) Anopheles pharoensis (11.4 %), Anopheles rhodesiensis (7.0 %); others (4.0 %). There were no significant changes in the relative abundance of different species of Culex mosquitoes due to changes in season, except Culex pipiens fatigans (36.4 %) and Culex tigripes (12.4 %). Results of the PCR identifications confirmed that Anopheles gambiae complex consisted of Anopheles arabiensis (66.7%) and Anopheles gambiae s.s.(6.7%). The study shows that Anopheles and Culex mosquito species abound in the study area with potential health consequences in the transmission of malaria and filariasis all year round. Keywords: gravid, Anopheles, Culex, identification, PCR. Nigerian Journal of Parasitology Vol. 28 (2) 2007: pp. 114-117

Key concepts: Anopheles gambiae, Anopheles, Biology, Culex, Culex quinquefasciatus, Veterinary medicine, Filariasis, Parasitology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Species\' identification of Anopheles and Culex mosquitoes and its epidemiological implications in Yola, Nigeria — Research Paper | ScholarLens