The discourse of Chinese literary theory and the dialogue between Western literary theory and Chinese literary
Shunqing Cao
Abstract
Shunqing Cao
Abstract
Some people believe that the Discourse of Chinese literary theory merely covers the categories such as qi(Airs), fenggu (Wind and Bone), shen-yun (Spiritual Resonance), bi and xing (Analogy and Evocative Images), miao-wu (Marvelous Enlightenment) and yi-jing (Artistic Moods) etc. However, from a culture prospective we analyzed the traditional Chinese Literary theory and sort out that the Discourse of Chinese Literary theory is not the above-mentioned categories but its own way to express in literature, just as the ancient Chinese put it” What is written doesn’t give the fullness of what is/was said; what is/was said does not give thefullness of the concepts in the mind”. Therefore, the Chinese Scholarshave strongly believed that the only way to convey meaning is to“establish the Images”. It is this discourse that has been highlightedin the Chinese Literary theory. On the basis of the former research thepresent paper aims at furthering the study of dialogue between WesternLiterary theory and Chinese Literary Theory by making it more specificand systematic. And four basic principles and five methods of startingdialogue between the two are put forward as the result.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Some people believe that the Discourse of Chinese literary theory merely covers the categories such as qi(Airs), fenggu (Wind and Bone), shen-yun (Spiritual Resonance), bi and xing (Analogy and Evocative Images), miao-wu (Marvelous Enlightenment) and yi-jing (Artistic Moods) etc. However, from a culture prospective we analyzed the traditional Chinese Literary theory and sort out that the Discourse of Chinese Literary theory is not the above-mentioned categories but its own way to express in literature, just as the ancient Chinese put it” What is written doesn’t give the fullness of what is/was said; what is/was said does not give thefullness of the concepts in the mind”. Therefore, the Chinese Scholarshave strongly believed that the only way to convey meaning is to“establish the Images”. It is this discourse that has been highlightedin the Chinese Literary theory. On the basis of the former research thepresent paper aims at furthering the study of dialogue between WesternLiterary theory and Chinese Literary Theory by making it more specificand systematic. And four basic principles and five methods of startingdialogue between the two are put forward as the result.
Key concepts: Enlightenment, Literary theory, Literary science, Meaning (existential), Analogy, Chinese literature, Literature, Literary criticism