2007Caligrama (São Paulo Online)Open access

The discourse of Chinese literary theory and the dialogue between Western literary theory and Chinese literary

Shunqing Cao

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Some people believe that the Discourse of Chinese literary theory merely covers the categories such as qi(Airs), fenggu (Wind and Bone), shen-yun (Spiritual Resonance), bi and xing (Analogy and Evocative Images), miao-wu (Marvelous Enlightenment) and yi-jing (Artistic Moods) etc. However, from a culture prospective we analyzed the traditional Chinese Literary theory and sort out that the Discourse of Chinese Literary theory is not the above-mentioned categories but its own way to express in literature, just as the ancient Chinese put it” What is written doesn’t give the fullness of what is/was said; what is/was said does not give thefullness of the concepts in the mind”. Therefore, the Chinese Scholarshave strongly believed that the only way to convey meaning is to“establish the Images”. It is this discourse that has been highlightedin the Chinese Literary theory. On the basis of the former research thepresent paper aims at furthering the study of dialogue between WesternLiterary theory and Chinese Literary Theory by making it more specificand systematic. And four basic principles and five methods of startingdialogue between the two are put forward as the result.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some people believe that the Discourse of Chinese literary theory merely covers the categories such as qi(Airs), fenggu (Wind and Bone), shen-yun (Spiritual Resonance), bi and xing (Analogy and Evocative Images), miao-wu (Marvelous Enlightenment) and yi-jing (Artistic Moods) etc. However, from a culture prospective we analyzed the traditional Chinese Literary theory and sort out that the Discourse of Chinese Literary theory is not the above-mentioned categories but its own way to express in literature, just as the ancient Chinese put it” What is written doesn’t give the fullness of what is/was said; what is/was said does not give thefullness of the concepts in the mind”. Therefore, the Chinese Scholarshave strongly believed that the only way to convey meaning is to“establish the Images”. It is this discourse that has been highlightedin the Chinese Literary theory. On the basis of the former research thepresent paper aims at furthering the study of dialogue between WesternLiterary theory and Chinese Literary Theory by making it more specificand systematic. And four basic principles and five methods of startingdialogue between the two are put forward as the result.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some people believe that the Discourse of Chinese literary theory merely covers the categories such as qi(Airs), fenggu (Wind and Bone), shen-yun (Spiritual Resonance), bi and xing (Analogy and Evocative Images), miao-wu (Marvelous Enlightenment) and yi-jing (Artistic Moods) etc. However, from a culture prospective we analyzed the traditional Chinese Literary theory and sort out that the Discourse of Chinese Literary theory is not the above-mentioned categories but its own way to express in literature, just as the ancient Chinese put it” What is written doesn’t give the fullness of what is/was said; what is/was said does not give thefullness of the concepts in the mind”. Therefore, the Chinese Scholarshave strongly believed that the only way to convey meaning is to“establish the Images”. It is this discourse that has been highlightedin the Chinese Literary theory. On the basis of the former research thepresent paper aims at furthering the study of dialogue between WesternLiterary theory and Chinese Literary Theory by making it more specificand systematic. And four basic principles and five methods of startingdialogue between the two are put forward as the result.

Key concepts: Enlightenment, Literary theory, Literary science, Meaning (existential), Analogy, Chinese literature, Literature, Literary criticism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The discourse of Chinese literary theory and the dialogue between Western literary theory and Chinese literary — Research Paper | ScholarLens