1975•Journal of MicroscopyRequires access

Distilled glutaraldehyde: its use in an improved fixation regime for cell suspensions

R. Gillett, Gareth Elwyn Jones, T. A. Partridge

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

A method is described for the sequential fixation of cell suspensions, suitable for use at room or culture temperatures. Though an adequate method for fixing cell suspensions does exist in the literature (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968), it involves the use of a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative. Since these two components inter-react, this method has many drawbacks. Previously described weaknesses of a sequential fixation regime (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968; Jones, Yeh & Hirsch, 1972) with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide have been overcome by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde as the primary fixative. The results, using a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative and using the two components sequentially on a variety of cell types, are compared. The advantages of a sequential fixation made possible by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde rather than commercial glutaraldehyde are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A method is described for the sequential fixation of cell suspensions, suitable for use at room or culture temperatures. Though an adequate method for fixing cell suspensions does exist in the literature (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968), it involves the use of a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative. Since these two components inter-react, this method has many drawbacks. Previously described weaknesses of a sequential fixation regime (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968; Jones, Yeh & Hirsch, 1972) with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide have been overcome by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde as the primary fixative. The results, using a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative and using the two components sequentially on a variety of cell types, are compared. The advantages of a sequential fixation made possible by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde rather than commercial glutaraldehyde are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A method is described for the sequential fixation of cell suspensions, suitable for use at room or culture temperatures. Though an adequate method for fixing cell suspensions does exist in the literature (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968), it involves the use of a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative. Since these two components inter-react, this method has many drawbacks. Previously described weaknesses of a sequential fixation regime (Hirsch & Fedorko, 1968; Jones, Yeh & Hirsch, 1972) with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide have been overcome by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde as the primary fixative. The results, using a mixed glutaraldehyde-osmium tetroxide fixative and using the two components sequentially on a variety of cell types, are compared. The advantages of a sequential fixation made possible by the use of vacuum distilled glutaraldehyde rather than commercial glutaraldehyde are discussed.

Key concepts: Glutaraldehyde, Fixative, Osmium tetroxide, Fixation (population genetics), Distilled water, Osmium, Chemistry, Chromatography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Distilled glutaraldehyde: its use in an improved fixation regime for cell suspensions — Research Paper | ScholarLens