2012•Asian Journal of ControlRequires access

Simple Robust Tuning of 2DoF PID Controllers From A Performance/Robustness Trade‐off Analysis

Víctor M. Alfaro, Ramón Vilanova

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents the performance/robustness trade‐off analysis of servo‐control and regulatory‐control systems. In this analysis, first‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (FOPDT) and second‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (SOPDT) controlled processes with one‐degree‐of‐freedom (1DoF) and two‐degree‐of‐freedom (2DoF) proportional integral (PI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers are considered. The analysis shows that for the same process, performance‐optimized1DoF PIcontrollers are more robust to changes in the process characteristics, but the optimal performance of these controllers is inferior to that of the correspondingPIDcontrollers. Regulatory‐control performance‐optimized PI andPIDcontrollers are less robust than the corresponding servo‐control systems, and a greater level of performance degradation is required in the former case to ensure that the robustness level becomes comparable to that in the latter case. On the basis of this analysis, a simply robust tuning method was developed for2DoF PIDcontrollers; the use of this procedure helps in achieving the desired level of robustness in closed‐loop control systems. The proposed tuning method allows the use of a single set of rules for the robust tuning ofPIDcontrollers forFOPDTandSOPDTcontrolled processes

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This paper presents the performance/robustness trade‐off analysis of servo‐control and regulatory‐control systems. In this analysis, first‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (FOPDT) and second‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (SOPDT) controlled processes with one‐degree‐of‐freedom (1DoF) and two‐degree‐of‐freedom (2DoF) proportional integral (PI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers are considered. The analysis shows that for the same process, performance‐optimized1DoF PIcontrollers are more robust to changes in the process characteristics, but the optimal performance of these controllers is inferior to that of the correspondingPIDcontrollers. Regulatory‐control performance‐optimized PI andPIDcontrollers are less robust than the corresponding servo‐control systems, and a greater level of performance degradation is required in the former case to ensure that the robustness level becomes comparable to that in the latter case. On the basis of this analysis, a simply robust tuning method was developed for2DoF PIDcontrollers; the use of this procedure helps in achieving the desired level of robustness in closed‐loop control systems. The proposed tuning method allows the use of a single set of rules for the robust tuning ofPIDcontrollers forFOPDTandSOPDTcontrolled processes

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This paper presents the performance/robustness trade‐off analysis of servo‐control and regulatory‐control systems. In this analysis, first‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (FOPDT) and second‐order‐plus‐dead‐time (SOPDT) controlled processes with one‐degree‐of‐freedom (1DoF) and two‐degree‐of‐freedom (2DoF) proportional integral (PI) and proportional integral derivative (PID) controllers are considered. The analysis shows that for the same process, performance‐optimized1DoF PIcontrollers are more robust to changes in the process characteristics, but the optimal performance of these controllers is inferior to that of the correspondingPIDcontrollers. Regulatory‐control performance‐optimized PI andPIDcontrollers are less robust than the corresponding servo‐control systems, and a greater level of performance degradation is required in the former case to ensure that the robustness level becomes comparable to that in the latter case. On the basis of this analysis, a simply robust tuning method was developed for2DoF PIDcontrollers; the use of this procedure helps in achieving the desired level of robustness in closed‐loop control systems. The proposed tuning method allows the use of a single set of rules for the robust tuning ofPIDcontrollers forFOPDTandSOPDTcontrolled processes

Key concepts: PID controller, Control theory (sociology), Robustness (evolution), Dead time, Servo, Control engineering, Servomechanism, Robust control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Simple Robust Tuning of 2DoF PID Controllers From A Performance/Robustness Trade‐off Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens