2011American Journal of NeuroradiologyOpen access

Cerebral Blood Flow Thresholds for Tissue Infarction in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Intra-Arterial Revascularization Therapy Depend on Timing of Reperfusion

Koji Mui, Albert J. Yoo, Luis A. Verduzco, William A. Copen, Joshua Adam Hirsch, R. Gilberto González, Pamela Whitney Schaefer

Open full text 24 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR perfusion CBF values can distinguish hypoperfused penumbral tissue likely to infarct from that which is likely to recover. Our aim was to determine if CBF thresholds for tissue infarction depend on the timing of recanalization in patients with acute stroke treated with IAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with acute proximal anterior circulation strokes underwent DWI and PWI before IAT. rCBF was obtained in the following areas: 1) C with abnormal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction; 2) PI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction and 3) PNI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, normal follow-up. rCBF in tissue reperfused at <6 hours (early recanalizers), in tissue reperfused at >6 hours (late RC), and in NRC was compared. RESULTS: For C, mean rCBF was 0.13 (SEM, 0.002), 0.29 (0.007), and 0.21 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001, for all comparisons). For PI, mean rCBF was 0.34 (0.006), 0.38 (0.008), and 0.39 (0.005) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and versus nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). For PNI, the mean rCBF was 0.38 (0.002), 0.48 (0.003), and 0.48 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). ROC analyzis demonstrated optimal rCBF thresholds for tissue infarction of 0.27 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 87%), 0.44 (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 75%), and 0.41 (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 77%) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CBF thresholds for tissue infarction in patients with acute stroke are lower in tissue that is reperfused at earlier time points. This information may be important in selecting patients who might benefit from reperfusion therapy.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR perfusion CBF values can distinguish hypoperfused penumbral tissue likely to infarct from that which is likely to recover. Our aim was to determine if CBF thresholds for tissue infarction depend on the timing of recanalization in patients with acute stroke treated with IAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with acute proximal anterior circulation strokes underwent DWI and PWI before IAT. rCBF was obtained in the following areas: 1) C with abnormal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction; 2) PI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction and 3) PNI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, normal follow-up. rCBF in tissue reperfused at <6 hours (early recanalizers), in tissue reperfused at >6 hours (late RC), and in NRC was compared. RESULTS: For C, mean rCBF was 0.13 (SEM, 0.002), 0.29 (0.007), and 0.21 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001, for all comparisons). For PI, mean rCBF was 0.34 (0.006), 0.38 (0.008), and 0.39 (0.005) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and versus nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). For PNI, the mean rCBF was 0.38 (0.002), 0.48 (0.003), and 0.48 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). ROC analyzis demonstrated optimal rCBF thresholds for tissue infarction of 0.27 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 87%), 0.44 (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 75%), and 0.41 (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 77%) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CBF thresholds for tissue infarction in patients with acute stroke are lower in tissue that is reperfused at earlier time points. This information may be important in selecting patients who might benefit from reperfusion therapy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR perfusion CBF values can distinguish hypoperfused penumbral tissue likely to infarct from that which is likely to recover. Our aim was to determine if CBF thresholds for tissue infarction depend on the timing of recanalization in patients with acute stroke treated with IAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with acute proximal anterior circulation strokes underwent DWI and PWI before IAT. rCBF was obtained in the following areas: 1) C with abnormal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction; 2) PI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, follow-up infarction and 3) PNI with normal DWI, reduced CBF, normal follow-up. rCBF in tissue reperfused at <6 hours (early recanalizers), in tissue reperfused at >6 hours (late RC), and in NRC was compared. RESULTS: For C, mean rCBF was 0.13 (SEM, 0.002), 0.29 (0.007), and 0.21 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001, for all comparisons). For PI, mean rCBF was 0.34 (0.006), 0.38 (0.008), and 0.39 (0.005) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and versus nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). For PNI, the mean rCBF was 0.38 (0.002), 0.48 (0.003), and 0.48 (0.004) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively (P < .001 for early-versus-late recanalizers and nonrecanalizers; P > .05 for late recanalizers versus nonrecanalizers). ROC analyzis demonstrated optimal rCBF thresholds for tissue infarction of 0.27 (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 87%), 0.44 (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 75%), and 0.41 (sensitivity, 78%; specificity, 77%) for early recanalizers, late recanalizers, and nonrecanalizers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CBF thresholds for tissue infarction in patients with acute stroke are lower in tissue that is reperfused at earlier time points. This information may be important in selecting patients who might benefit from reperfusion therapy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Cerebral blood flow, Infarction, Perfusion, Penumbra, Revascularization, Cardiology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cerebral Blood Flow Thresholds for Tissue Infarction in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Intra-Arterial Revascularization Therapy Depend on Timing of Reperfusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens