2009•Indian Journal of UrologyOpen access

Role of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of duplex renal system: Our initial experience at a tertiary care institute

MilindP Joshi, Heemanshi Shah, Sandesh Parelkar, AmitA Agrawal, Beejal V. Sanghvi

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

AIM: To determine diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography in cases of duplex renal system. METHOD: Twenty cases between five month to nine years with suspected or known duplex renal system were evaluated by ultrasound (USG), micturating cystourethrography (MCU), intravenous urography (IVU) and magnetic resonance urography (MRU). The findings of these diagnostic imaging studies were then compared with each other and against the results of final diagnosis established at surgery. RESULTS: Duplex renal system could be identified in two of these cases on USG, was diagnosed in four in IVU and could be diagnosed in all cases with MRU. CONCLUSION: MRU is superior and far accurate than IVU, MCU and USG in diagnosing duplex renal system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To determine diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography in cases of duplex renal system. METHOD: Twenty cases between five month to nine years with suspected or known duplex renal system were evaluated by ultrasound (USG), micturating cystourethrography (MCU), intravenous urography (IVU) and magnetic resonance urography (MRU). The findings of these diagnostic imaging studies were then compared with each other and against the results of final diagnosis established at surgery. RESULTS: Duplex renal system could be identified in two of these cases on USG, was diagnosed in four in IVU and could be diagnosed in all cases with MRU. CONCLUSION: MRU is superior and far accurate than IVU, MCU and USG in diagnosing duplex renal system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To determine diagnostic value of magnetic resonance urography in cases of duplex renal system. METHOD: Twenty cases between five month to nine years with suspected or known duplex renal system were evaluated by ultrasound (USG), micturating cystourethrography (MCU), intravenous urography (IVU) and magnetic resonance urography (MRU). The findings of these diagnostic imaging studies were then compared with each other and against the results of final diagnosis established at surgery. RESULTS: Duplex renal system could be identified in two of these cases on USG, was diagnosed in four in IVU and could be diagnosed in all cases with MRU. CONCLUSION: MRU is superior and far accurate than IVU, MCU and USG in diagnosing duplex renal system.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pyelogram, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiology, Duplex (building), Ultrasound, Cystourethrography, Intravenous urography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Role of magnetic resonance urography in diagnosis of duplex renal system: Our initial experience at a tertiary care institute — Research Paper | ScholarLens