1982Canadian Journal of Soil ScienceOpen access

QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NET NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOILS

R. J. K. Myers, KL Weier, C. A. Campbell

Open full text 168 citations

Abstract

The 0- to 15- and 15- to 30-cm depths of five cultivated Queensland soils and 32 virgin and cultivated western Canadian soils were incubated at a range of moisture contents for 14 days at 35 °C. In most soils, net nitrogen mineralization was linearly related to moisture content in the available range (−0.03 to −4.0 MPa). Optimum moisture for net nitrogen mineralization corresponded to a soil pore water potential of between −0.01 and −0.03 MPa, while that at which no net nitrogen mineralization occurred was close to −4.0 MPa. Initially, the regression for each soil was normalized by the method of Stanford and co-workers, but this technique proved unsatisfactory. However, by normalizing against available moisture (between −0.03 and −4.0 MPa) we succeeded in grouping the soils. The response of all soils could be described by a model of the form: y = bx + (1 − b)x2 constrained to pass through x0, y0 and x1, y1when both axes were scaled between 0 and 1. In the equation, y is net nitrogen mineralized expressed as a proportion of the maximum rate; x is normalized moisture content; and the subscripts max and 0 refer to soil pore water potentials of −0.03 and −4.0 MPa, respectively. Almost all data conformed to this model. Most soils had a linear response (i.e., b = 1.0), but nine Canadian and one Queensland soil showed a curvilinear response. The expression worked well for the nine Canadian soils and b was estimated statistically to range between 1.22 and 2.18.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The 0- to 15- and 15- to 30-cm depths of five cultivated Queensland soils and 32 virgin and cultivated western Canadian soils were incubated at a range of moisture contents for 14 days at 35 °C. In most soils, net nitrogen mineralization was linearly related to moisture content in the available range (−0.03 to −4.0 MPa). Optimum moisture for net nitrogen mineralization corresponded to a soil pore water potential of between −0.01 and −0.03 MPa, while that at which no net nitrogen mineralization occurred was close to −4.0 MPa. Initially, the regression for each soil was normalized by the method of Stanford and co-workers, but this technique proved unsatisfactory. However, by normalizing against available moisture (between −0.03 and −4.0 MPa) we succeeded in grouping the soils. The response of all soils could be described by a model of the form: y = bx + (1 − b)x2 constrained to pass through x0, y0 and x1, y1when both axes were scaled between 0 and 1. In the equation, y is net nitrogen mineralized expressed as a proportion of the maximum rate; x is normalized moisture content; and the subscripts max and 0 refer to soil pore water potentials of −0.03 and −4.0 MPa, respectively. Almost all data conformed to this model. Most soils had a linear response (i.e., b = 1.0), but nine Canadian and one Queensland soil showed a curvilinear response. The expression worked well for the nine Canadian soils and b was estimated statistically to range between 1.22 and 2.18.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 168 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The 0- to 15- and 15- to 30-cm depths of five cultivated Queensland soils and 32 virgin and cultivated western Canadian soils were incubated at a range of moisture contents for 14 days at 35 °C. In most soils, net nitrogen mineralization was linearly related to moisture content in the available range (−0.03 to −4.0 MPa). Optimum moisture for net nitrogen mineralization corresponded to a soil pore water potential of between −0.01 and −0.03 MPa, while that at which no net nitrogen mineralization occurred was close to −4.0 MPa. Initially, the regression for each soil was normalized by the method of Stanford and co-workers, but this technique proved unsatisfactory. However, by normalizing against available moisture (between −0.03 and −4.0 MPa) we succeeded in grouping the soils. The response of all soils could be described by a model of the form: y = bx + (1 − b)x2 constrained to pass through x0, y0 and x1, y1when both axes were scaled between 0 and 1. In the equation, y is net nitrogen mineralized expressed as a proportion of the maximum rate; x is normalized moisture content; and the subscripts max and 0 refer to soil pore water potentials of −0.03 and −4.0 MPa, respectively. Almost all data conformed to this model. Most soils had a linear response (i.e., b = 1.0), but nine Canadian and one Queensland soil showed a curvilinear response. The expression worked well for the nine Canadian soils and b was estimated statistically to range between 1.22 and 2.18.

Key concepts: Soil water, Mineralization (soil science), Water content, Nitrogen, Moisture, Nitrogen cycle, Soil science, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NET NITROGEN MINERALIZATION AND MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOILS — Research Paper | ScholarLens