1987International Journal of Behavioral DevelopmentRequires access

The Construction of Perspectives: Piaget's Alternative to Spatial Egocentrism

John R. Morss

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

This paper explores longstanding inconsistencies in Piaget's account of the development of spatial representation and perspective-taking. It is argued that Piaget effectively develops an "alternative" theoretical position alongside but quite incompatible with the well-known theory of spatial egocentrism. This alternative theory focuses on the general differentiation of perspectives as such. The origins of both accounts are traced in Piaget's early writings, and detailed consideration is given to the findings of the original "three mountains" experiment. The place of both theories in The child's conception of space (Piaget & Inhelder, 1948/1956) is explored. Contemporary theory and research are discussed against this background, and it is concluded that Piaget's alternative theory is both compatible with contemporary thinking and important as a contributory source for future theorisation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores longstanding inconsistencies in Piaget's account of the development of spatial representation and perspective-taking. It is argued that Piaget effectively develops an "alternative" theoretical position alongside but quite incompatible with the well-known theory of spatial egocentrism. This alternative theory focuses on the general differentiation of perspectives as such. The origins of both accounts are traced in Piaget's early writings, and detailed consideration is given to the findings of the original "three mountains" experiment. The place of both theories in The child's conception of space (Piaget & Inhelder, 1948/1956) is explored. Contemporary theory and research are discussed against this background, and it is concluded that Piaget's alternative theory is both compatible with contemporary thinking and important as a contributory source for future theorisation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores longstanding inconsistencies in Piaget's account of the development of spatial representation and perspective-taking. It is argued that Piaget effectively develops an "alternative" theoretical position alongside but quite incompatible with the well-known theory of spatial egocentrism. This alternative theory focuses on the general differentiation of perspectives as such. The origins of both accounts are traced in Piaget's early writings, and detailed consideration is given to the findings of the original "three mountains" experiment. The place of both theories in The child's conception of space (Piaget & Inhelder, 1948/1956) is explored. Contemporary theory and research are discussed against this background, and it is concluded that Piaget's alternative theory is both compatible with contemporary thinking and important as a contributory source for future theorisation.

Key concepts: Egocentrism, Centration, Piaget's theory of cognitive development, Perspective (graphical), Psychology, Cognitive development, Constructivism (international relations), Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Construction of Perspectives: Piaget's Alternative to Spatial Egocentrism — Research Paper | ScholarLens