2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Quality of IT support for corporate environmental management: A paradigmatic framework

Stephen Corea, Margi Levy

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Organisations face increasing pressures to deploy appropriate environmental sustainability practices and reduce their ecological impacts. The use of information technologies (IT) offer much potential for supporting such practices, through data processing and reporting mechanisms, as well as being a platform for business redesign. This theoretical paper argues that in order to evaluate the quality of IT support in this area, critical consideration should be given to the 'environmental paradigm' that is serving as the basis of evaluation i.e. the underlying assumptions/model of what constitutes environmental sustainability in the modern enterprise. Drawing from a synthesis of relevant literature, this paper presents a framework that distinguishes three environmental paradigms, and the salient criteria that they suggest as the basis for assessing the quality of IT support in this arena. The criteria seen to be important are: eco-efficiency, eco-efficacy and eco-effectiveness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Organisations face increasing pressures to deploy appropriate environmental sustainability practices and reduce their ecological impacts. The use of information technologies (IT) offer much potential for supporting such practices, through data processing and reporting mechanisms, as well as being a platform for business redesign. This theoretical paper argues that in order to evaluate the quality of IT support in this area, critical consideration should be given to the 'environmental paradigm' that is serving as the basis of evaluation i.e. the underlying assumptions/model of what constitutes environmental sustainability in the modern enterprise. Drawing from a synthesis of relevant literature, this paper presents a framework that distinguishes three environmental paradigms, and the salient criteria that they suggest as the basis for assessing the quality of IT support in this arena. The criteria seen to be important are: eco-efficiency, eco-efficacy and eco-effectiveness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Organisations face increasing pressures to deploy appropriate environmental sustainability practices and reduce their ecological impacts. The use of information technologies (IT) offer much potential for supporting such practices, through data processing and reporting mechanisms, as well as being a platform for business redesign. This theoretical paper argues that in order to evaluate the quality of IT support in this area, critical consideration should be given to the 'environmental paradigm' that is serving as the basis of evaluation i.e. the underlying assumptions/model of what constitutes environmental sustainability in the modern enterprise. Drawing from a synthesis of relevant literature, this paper presents a framework that distinguishes three environmental paradigms, and the salient criteria that they suggest as the basis for assessing the quality of IT support in this arena. The criteria seen to be important are: eco-efficiency, eco-efficacy and eco-effectiveness.

Key concepts: Sustainability, Salient, Quality (philosophy), Computer science, Order (exchange), Face (sociological concept), Process management, Corporate sustainability

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality of IT support for corporate environmental management: A paradigmatic framework — Research Paper | ScholarLens