Internal Displacement and the Right to Seek Asylum
Elizabeth Ferris
Abstract
Elizabeth Ferris
Abstract
This article examines the relationship between the right to seek asylum and internal displacement by considering the relationship between internal and external displacement; the impact of closed borders on internal displacement; refugee returns and internal displacement; the internal flight alternative and its implications for asylum-seekers; and the role of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in both upholding asylum and increasing its engagement with internally displaced persons (IDPs). The study argues that when governments deny asylum to individuals on the grounds that they can find protection elsewhere within their own countries, they are in effect contributing to the increase in internal displacement. While discussion of the internal flight alternative has focused on the ability of an individual to find safety in another part of the country, the article suggests that the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement – which spell out a full range of rights for IDPs – should be used to determine whether an internal flight alternative can be considered.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article examines the relationship between the right to seek asylum and internal displacement by considering the relationship between internal and external displacement; the impact of closed borders on internal displacement; refugee returns and internal displacement; the internal flight alternative and its implications for asylum-seekers; and the role of United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in both upholding asylum and increasing its engagement with internally displaced persons (IDPs). The study argues that when governments deny asylum to individuals on the grounds that they can find protection elsewhere within their own countries, they are in effect contributing to the increase in internal displacement. While discussion of the internal flight alternative has focused on the ability of an individual to find safety in another part of the country, the article suggests that the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement – which spell out a full range of rights for IDPs – should be used to determine whether an internal flight alternative can be considered.
Key concepts: Refugee, Displacement (psychology), Internally displaced person, Spell, Internal conflict, Displaced person, Political science, Internal migration