Message passing between sequential processes: The reply primitive and the administrator concept
W. Morven Gentleman
Abstract
W. Morven Gentleman
Abstract
Abstract Message passing as a method of synchronizing and communicating among sequential processes is not as widely understood as monitors, and there is greater diversity in the semantics of what is meant by message passing. This paper surveys some of the issues on which there are differences and gives the rationale behind certain choices and some examples of experience with them. Paradigms are presented for process structuring found to be commonly useful.
OpenAlex reports 148 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract Message passing as a method of synchronizing and communicating among sequential processes is not as widely understood as monitors, and there is greater diversity in the semantics of what is meant by message passing. This paper surveys some of the issues on which there are differences and gives the rationale behind certain choices and some examples of experience with them. Paradigms are presented for process structuring found to be commonly useful.
Key concepts: Synchronizing, Structuring, Message passing, Computer science, Semantics (computer science), Diversity (politics), Process (computing), Communicating sequential processes