A formalization of expression semantics for an executable modeling language
Neustadter
Abstract
Neustadter
Abstract
Proposes a method for formally specifying an executable modeling language's (EML's) expression sublanguage. We demonstrate the method in terms of a generic executable modeling language called GEML that is representative of a number of existing algebraic EMLs, including AMPL, GAMS, LINGO, and SML. Formalizing EML expression semantics is important for a number of reasons: semantic formalization enables certain kinds of EML implementation algorithms to be proved correct, can help reduce modeling errors, enables model portability, and may serve to bring greater focus to some issues of modeling language design.>
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Proposes a method for formally specifying an executable modeling language's (EML's) expression sublanguage. We demonstrate the method in terms of a generic executable modeling language called GEML that is representative of a number of existing algebraic EMLs, including AMPL, GAMS, LINGO, and SML. Formalizing EML expression semantics is important for a number of reasons: semantic formalization enables certain kinds of EML implementation algorithms to be proved correct, can help reduce modeling errors, enables model portability, and may serve to bring greater focus to some issues of modeling language design.>
Key concepts: Sublanguage, Executable, Programming language, Computer science, Semantics (computer science), Software portability, Expression (computer science), Modeling language