2013Critical Care NurseRequires access

Extubation With or Without Spontaneous Breathing Trial

Jing Wang, Yingmin Ma, Qiuhong Fang

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Purpose- To evaluate whether spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are necessary when extubating critical care patients. Methods- A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed in adult patients supported by mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in the general intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Patients ready for weaning were randomly assigned to either the SBT group (extubation with an SBT) or the no-SBT group (extubation without an SBT). Patients in the SBT group who tolerated SBT underwent immediate extubation. Patients in the no-SBT group who met the weaning readiness criteria underwent extubation without an SBT. The primary outcome measure was a successful extubation or the ability to maintain spontaneous breathing for 48 hours after extubation. Results- A total of 139 adult patients were enrolled. No significant difference in the demographic, respiratory, and hemodynamic characteristics was indicated between the groups at the end of weaning readiness assessment. Successful extubation was achieved in 56 of 61 patients (91.8%) in the SBT group and 54 of 60 patients (90.0%) in the no-SBT group. In the SBT and no-SBT groups, 5 (8.2%) and 6 (10.0%) patients, respectively, needed reintubation; 7 (11.5%) and 9 (15.0%) patients, respectively, required noninvasive ventilation after extubation. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion- Intensive care patients can be extubated successfully without an SBT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose- To evaluate whether spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are necessary when extubating critical care patients. Methods- A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed in adult patients supported by mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in the general intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Patients ready for weaning were randomly assigned to either the SBT group (extubation with an SBT) or the no-SBT group (extubation without an SBT). Patients in the SBT group who tolerated SBT underwent immediate extubation. Patients in the no-SBT group who met the weaning readiness criteria underwent extubation without an SBT. The primary outcome measure was a successful extubation or the ability to maintain spontaneous breathing for 48 hours after extubation. Results- A total of 139 adult patients were enrolled. No significant difference in the demographic, respiratory, and hemodynamic characteristics was indicated between the groups at the end of weaning readiness assessment. Successful extubation was achieved in 56 of 61 patients (91.8%) in the SBT group and 54 of 60 patients (90.0%) in the no-SBT group. In the SBT and no-SBT groups, 5 (8.2%) and 6 (10.0%) patients, respectively, needed reintubation; 7 (11.5%) and 9 (15.0%) patients, respectively, required noninvasive ventilation after extubation. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion- Intensive care patients can be extubated successfully without an SBT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose- To evaluate whether spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) are necessary when extubating critical care patients. Methods- A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was performed in adult patients supported by mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in the general intensive care unit of a teaching hospital. Patients ready for weaning were randomly assigned to either the SBT group (extubation with an SBT) or the no-SBT group (extubation without an SBT). Patients in the SBT group who tolerated SBT underwent immediate extubation. Patients in the no-SBT group who met the weaning readiness criteria underwent extubation without an SBT. The primary outcome measure was a successful extubation or the ability to maintain spontaneous breathing for 48 hours after extubation. Results- A total of 139 adult patients were enrolled. No significant difference in the demographic, respiratory, and hemodynamic characteristics was indicated between the groups at the end of weaning readiness assessment. Successful extubation was achieved in 56 of 61 patients (91.8%) in the SBT group and 54 of 60 patients (90.0%) in the no-SBT group. In the SBT and no-SBT groups, 5 (8.2%) and 6 (10.0%) patients, respectively, needed reintubation; 7 (11.5%) and 9 (15.0%) patients, respectively, required noninvasive ventilation after extubation. In-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusion- Intensive care patients can be extubated successfully without an SBT.

Key concepts: Medicine, Spontaneous breathing trial, Breathing, Anesthesia, Intensive care medicine, Mechanical ventilation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Extubation With or Without Spontaneous Breathing Trial — Research Paper | ScholarLens