2013The Clinical Respiratory JournalRequires access

Predictive value of B erlin Q uestionnaire and E pworth S leepiness S cale for obstructive sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population

Sevinç Sarınç Ulaşlı, Ersin Günay, Tülay Koyuncu, Olcay Akar, Bilal Halici, Sena Ulu, Mehmet Burçin Ünlü

Open publisher page 70 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. METHODS: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. METHODS: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 70 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Berlin Questionnaire (BQ) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) are two of the widely used screening instruments for subjects suffering from sleep disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the predictive accuracy of the BQ and ESS in the subjects who were admitted to our sleep clinic, using overnight polysomnography as the 'gold standard'. METHODS: The BQ and ESS were performed to 1450 subjects hospitalized in our sleep clinic for polysomnographic evaluation. RESULTS: One thousand two hundred thirty of 1450 subjects (84.8%) had apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5, and 70.5% of them were classified as being at high risk of sleep apnea with BQ and 45.9% of them were classified as having excessive daytime sleepiness with ESS. Being in the high-risk group with the self-reported, BQ predicted an AHI ≥ 5 with a sensitivity of 0.73 and a specificity of 0.44, vs a sensitivity of 0.46 and a specificity of 0.60 with the self-reported ESS. Sensitivity of BQ (0.80) was highest when we selected the cut-off value of AHI as 30. When we evaluated the predictive accuracy of BQ and ESS together, specificity of both instruments as 0.72 at AHI cut-off value of 5 was found. AHIs were significantly correlated with the scores in each category and the total scores of BQ (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The BQ is a poor predictor of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in subjects admitted to our sleep clinic. BQ and ESS together may be used to detect patients with low risk for OSA.

Key concepts: Medicine, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Polysomnography, Obstructive sleep apnea, Predictive value, Sleep apnea, Excessive daytime sleepiness, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predictive value of B erlin Q uestionnaire and E pworth S leepiness S cale for obstructive sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population — Research Paper | ScholarLens