2015The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Loudness of temporally varying environmental sounds

Jesko L. Verhey, Jan Hots, Moritz Wächtler, Jan Rennies

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Loudness of speech, speech-like signals, and other dynamic environmental sounds were measured and compared to predictions of current loudness models and predictions on the basis of the relevant standards. Loudness was assessed experimentally by using a loudness matching procedure and categorical loudness scaling. The scaling method used in our study is in agreement with the requirements of the international standard on categorical loudness scaling. Categorical scaling allows for a fast assessment of loudness over a large level range but has the disadvantage that loudness is not measured in sones, as commonly used in loudness models. The data of the two methods are compared by deriving levels at equal loudness from the categorical loudness data. In addition, the present study discusses to what extend the scaling data can be compared to loudness predictions by using recently proposed equations relating categorical units to sones. The comparison of the measured levels at equal loudness and simulations revealed that for speech and speech-like signals the long-term spectrum largely determines the loudness of the sound. Dynamic models with short time constants tend to overestimate loudness. In general, this is also true for the other environmental sounds although for some technical signals discrepancies remain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Loudness of speech, speech-like signals, and other dynamic environmental sounds were measured and compared to predictions of current loudness models and predictions on the basis of the relevant standards. Loudness was assessed experimentally by using a loudness matching procedure and categorical loudness scaling. The scaling method used in our study is in agreement with the requirements of the international standard on categorical loudness scaling. Categorical scaling allows for a fast assessment of loudness over a large level range but has the disadvantage that loudness is not measured in sones, as commonly used in loudness models. The data of the two methods are compared by deriving levels at equal loudness from the categorical loudness data. In addition, the present study discusses to what extend the scaling data can be compared to loudness predictions by using recently proposed equations relating categorical units to sones. The comparison of the measured levels at equal loudness and simulations revealed that for speech and speech-like signals the long-term spectrum largely determines the loudness of the sound. Dynamic models with short time constants tend to overestimate loudness. In general, this is also true for the other environmental sounds although for some technical signals discrepancies remain.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Loudness of speech, speech-like signals, and other dynamic environmental sounds were measured and compared to predictions of current loudness models and predictions on the basis of the relevant standards. Loudness was assessed experimentally by using a loudness matching procedure and categorical loudness scaling. The scaling method used in our study is in agreement with the requirements of the international standard on categorical loudness scaling. Categorical scaling allows for a fast assessment of loudness over a large level range but has the disadvantage that loudness is not measured in sones, as commonly used in loudness models. The data of the two methods are compared by deriving levels at equal loudness from the categorical loudness data. In addition, the present study discusses to what extend the scaling data can be compared to loudness predictions by using recently proposed equations relating categorical units to sones. The comparison of the measured levels at equal loudness and simulations revealed that for speech and speech-like signals the long-term spectrum largely determines the loudness of the sound. Dynamic models with short time constants tend to overestimate loudness. In general, this is also true for the other environmental sounds although for some technical signals discrepancies remain.

Key concepts: Loudness, Categorical variable, Scaling, Mathematics, Acoustics, Range (aeronautics), Speech recognition, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Loudness of temporally varying environmental sounds — Research Paper | ScholarLens