1995•IEEE Transactions on ComputersRequires access

Effective hardware-based data prefetching for high-performance processors

Tien-Fu Chen, Jean-Loup Baer

Open publisher page 558 citations

Abstract

Memory latency and bandwidth are progressing at a much slower pace than processor performance. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the performance of three variations of a hardware function unit whose goal is to assist a data cache in prefetching data accesses so that memory latency is hidden as often as possible. The basic idea of the prefetching scheme is to keep track of data access patterns in a reference prediction table (RPT) organized as an instruction cache. The three designs differ mostly on the timing of the prefetching. In the simplest scheme (basic), prefetches can be generated one iteration ahead of actual use. The lookahead variation takes advantage of a lookahead program counter that ideally stays one memory latency time ahead of the real program counter and that is used as the control mechanism to generate the prefetches. Finally the correlated scheme uses a more sophisticated design to detect patterns across loop levels. These designs are evaluated by simulating the ten SPEC benchmarks on a cycle-by-cycle basis. The results show that 1) the three hardware prefetching schemes all yield significant reductions in the data access penalty when compared with regular caches, 2) the benefits are greater when the hardware assist augments small on-chip caches, and 3) the lookahead scheme is the preferred one cost-performance wise.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Memory latency and bandwidth are progressing at a much slower pace than processor performance. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the performance of three variations of a hardware function unit whose goal is to assist a data cache in prefetching data accesses so that memory latency is hidden as often as possible. The basic idea of the prefetching scheme is to keep track of data access patterns in a reference prediction table (RPT) organized as an instruction cache. The three designs differ mostly on the timing of the prefetching. In the simplest scheme (basic), prefetches can be generated one iteration ahead of actual use. The lookahead variation takes advantage of a lookahead program counter that ideally stays one memory latency time ahead of the real program counter and that is used as the control mechanism to generate the prefetches. Finally the correlated scheme uses a more sophisticated design to detect patterns across loop levels. These designs are evaluated by simulating the ten SPEC benchmarks on a cycle-by-cycle basis. The results show that 1) the three hardware prefetching schemes all yield significant reductions in the data access penalty when compared with regular caches, 2) the benefits are greater when the hardware assist augments small on-chip caches, and 3) the lookahead scheme is the preferred one cost-performance wise.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 558 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Memory latency and bandwidth are progressing at a much slower pace than processor performance. In this paper, we describe and evaluate the performance of three variations of a hardware function unit whose goal is to assist a data cache in prefetching data accesses so that memory latency is hidden as often as possible. The basic idea of the prefetching scheme is to keep track of data access patterns in a reference prediction table (RPT) organized as an instruction cache. The three designs differ mostly on the timing of the prefetching. In the simplest scheme (basic), prefetches can be generated one iteration ahead of actual use. The lookahead variation takes advantage of a lookahead program counter that ideally stays one memory latency time ahead of the real program counter and that is used as the control mechanism to generate the prefetches. Finally the correlated scheme uses a more sophisticated design to detect patterns across loop levels. These designs are evaluated by simulating the ten SPEC benchmarks on a cycle-by-cycle basis. The results show that 1) the three hardware prefetching schemes all yield significant reductions in the data access penalty when compared with regular caches, 2) the benefits are greater when the hardware assist augments small on-chip caches, and 3) the lookahead scheme is the preferred one cost-performance wise.>

Key concepts: Computer science, Spec#, Latency (audio), Cache, Parallel computing, CAS latency, Computer hardware, Memory bandwidth

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effective hardware-based data prefetching for high-performance processors — Research Paper | ScholarLens