Dana Arnold
Abstract
This paper considers how the expanding geographical boundaries of architectural history influence our conceptualization of the discipline—in other words who (and what) we think are the subjects of architectural history and furthermore for whom we think its narratives are written.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper considers how the expanding geographical boundaries of architectural history influence our conceptualization of the discipline—in other words who (and what) we think are the subjects of architectural history and furthermore for whom we think its narratives are written.
Key concepts: Conceptualization, History of architecture, Narrative, Architecture, History, Aesthetics, Sociology, Computer science