2011•The Journal of Infectious DiseasesRequires access

Safety and Immunogenicity of Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Children With Cancer

Silvana B. Carr, Kim Allison, Lee-Ann Van de Velde, Kelly Zhang, Elizabeth Y. English, Amy Iverson, Najat C. Daw, Scott C. Howard, Fariba Navid, Carlos Rodríguez‐Galindo, Jie Yang, Elisabeth E. Adderson, Jonathan A. McCullers, Patricia M. Flynn

Open publisher page 45 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has not been compared to that of the standard trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in children with cancer. METHODS: Randomized study of LAIV versus TIV in children with cancer, age 2-21 years, vaccinated according to recommendations based on age and prior vaccination. Data on reactogenicity and other adverse events and blood and nasal swab samples were obtained following vaccination. RESULTS: Fifty-five eligible subjects (mean age, 10.4 years) received vaccine (28 LAIV/27 TIV). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Rhinorrhea reported within 10 days of vaccination was similar in both groups (36% LAIV vs 33% TIV, P > .999). Ten LAIV recipients shed virus; the latest viral shedding was detected 7 days after vaccination. Immunogenicity data were available for 52 subjects, or 26 in each group. TIV induced significantly higher postvaccination geometric mean titers against influenza A viruses (P < .001), greater seroprotection against influenza A/H1N1 (P = .01), and greater seroconversion against A/H3N2 (P = .004), compared with LAIV. No differences after vaccination were observed against influenza B viruses. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, serum antibody response against influenza A strains were greater with TIV than with LAIV in children with cancer. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and prolonged viral shedding after LAIV was not detected. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00906750.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has not been compared to that of the standard trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in children with cancer. METHODS: Randomized study of LAIV versus TIV in children with cancer, age 2-21 years, vaccinated according to recommendations based on age and prior vaccination. Data on reactogenicity and other adverse events and blood and nasal swab samples were obtained following vaccination. RESULTS: Fifty-five eligible subjects (mean age, 10.4 years) received vaccine (28 LAIV/27 TIV). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Rhinorrhea reported within 10 days of vaccination was similar in both groups (36% LAIV vs 33% TIV, P > .999). Ten LAIV recipients shed virus; the latest viral shedding was detected 7 days after vaccination. Immunogenicity data were available for 52 subjects, or 26 in each group. TIV induced significantly higher postvaccination geometric mean titers against influenza A viruses (P < .001), greater seroprotection against influenza A/H1N1 (P = .01), and greater seroconversion against A/H3N2 (P = .004), compared with LAIV. No differences after vaccination were observed against influenza B viruses. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, serum antibody response against influenza A strains were greater with TIV than with LAIV in children with cancer. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and prolonged viral shedding after LAIV was not detected. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00906750.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 45 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and immunogenicity of live, attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) has not been compared to that of the standard trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in children with cancer. METHODS: Randomized study of LAIV versus TIV in children with cancer, age 2-21 years, vaccinated according to recommendations based on age and prior vaccination. Data on reactogenicity and other adverse events and blood and nasal swab samples were obtained following vaccination. RESULTS: Fifty-five eligible subjects (mean age, 10.4 years) received vaccine (28 LAIV/27 TIV). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Rhinorrhea reported within 10 days of vaccination was similar in both groups (36% LAIV vs 33% TIV, P > .999). Ten LAIV recipients shed virus; the latest viral shedding was detected 7 days after vaccination. Immunogenicity data were available for 52 subjects, or 26 in each group. TIV induced significantly higher postvaccination geometric mean titers against influenza A viruses (P < .001), greater seroprotection against influenza A/H1N1 (P = .01), and greater seroconversion against A/H3N2 (P = .004), compared with LAIV. No differences after vaccination were observed against influenza B viruses. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, serum antibody response against influenza A strains were greater with TIV than with LAIV in children with cancer. Both vaccines were well tolerated, and prolonged viral shedding after LAIV was not detected. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00906750.

Key concepts: Live attenuated influenza vaccine, Reactogenicity, Medicine, Vaccination, Immunogenicity, Influenza vaccine, Immunology, Virology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Safety and Immunogenicity of Live Attenuated and Inactivated Influenza Vaccines in Children With Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens