2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Intellectual property and the process of invention: why software is different

Robert Plotkin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their function. Software developers, therefore, engage in functional, but not structural, design. Patent law, however, assumes that an inventor must engage in structural design to invent a new electromechanical machine, and therefore requires electromechanical inventors to conceive Of describe, and claim their inventions in terms of their physical structure. This chasm between patent law's assumptions and the reality of software development has the potential to result in an unwarranted expansion of software patent claim scope. Modifications to patent law are recommended which reflect the unique manner in which software programs are invented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their function. Software developers, therefore, engage in functional, but not structural, design. Patent law, however, assumes that an inventor must engage in structural design to invent a new electromechanical machine, and therefore requires electromechanical inventors to conceive Of describe, and claim their inventions in terms of their physical structure. This chasm between patent law's assumptions and the reality of software development has the potential to result in an unwarranted expansion of software patent claim scope. Modifications to patent law are recommended which reflect the unique manner in which software programs are invented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Software differs from other electromechanical technologies because of the unique process by which software programs are invented In particular, software developers create novel executable software programs, which are components of a computer, by conceiving of and specifying such programs solely in terms of their function. Software developers, therefore, engage in functional, but not structural, design. Patent law, however, assumes that an inventor must engage in structural design to invent a new electromechanical machine, and therefore requires electromechanical inventors to conceive Of describe, and claim their inventions in terms of their physical structure. This chasm between patent law's assumptions and the reality of software development has the potential to result in an unwarranted expansion of software patent claim scope. Modifications to patent law are recommended which reflect the unique manner in which software programs are invented.

Key concepts: Software engineering, Software, Software development, Computer science, Personal software process, Social software engineering, Scope (computer science), Process (computing)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intellectual property and the process of invention: why software is different — Research Paper | ScholarLens