1985IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal ProcessingRequires access

Models for representing the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth

DA Chalker, D. Mackerras

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

The acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth is important in the production of speech in that it affects the amount of acoustic power radiated away from the mouth and it influences the acoustic response of the excited vocal tract. Five existing methods of modeling the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth are: 1) the pulsating sphere, 2) the circular piston in an infinite baffle, 3) the circular piston in a spherical baffle, 4) an approximation by Fant, and 5) an approximation by Flanagan. A comparison has been carried out between the acoustic impedances as a function of frequency predicted by these models for mouth aperture areas of 0.9 and 5.0 cm2. The basis for comparison was the piston-in-a-spherical-baffle model. This model was chosen as being the most physically representative one which is computationally tractable, although it is by far the most computationally difficult of the models considered. Special precautions were needed to prevent errors due to arithmetic overflow. On the basis of the comparison, a new approximation is proposed. This new model is based on the piston-in-an-infinite-baffle model, but includes more terms than the Flanagan model, resulting in increased accuracy for higher frequencies and larger mouth apertures.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth is important in the production of speech in that it affects the amount of acoustic power radiated away from the mouth and it influences the acoustic response of the excited vocal tract. Five existing methods of modeling the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth are: 1) the pulsating sphere, 2) the circular piston in an infinite baffle, 3) the circular piston in a spherical baffle, 4) an approximation by Fant, and 5) an approximation by Flanagan. A comparison has been carried out between the acoustic impedances as a function of frequency predicted by these models for mouth aperture areas of 0.9 and 5.0 cm2. The basis for comparison was the piston-in-a-spherical-baffle model. This model was chosen as being the most physically representative one which is computationally tractable, although it is by far the most computationally difficult of the models considered. Special precautions were needed to prevent errors due to arithmetic overflow. On the basis of the comparison, a new approximation is proposed. This new model is based on the piston-in-an-infinite-baffle model, but includes more terms than the Flanagan model, resulting in increased accuracy for higher frequencies and larger mouth apertures.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth is important in the production of speech in that it affects the amount of acoustic power radiated away from the mouth and it influences the acoustic response of the excited vocal tract. Five existing methods of modeling the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth are: 1) the pulsating sphere, 2) the circular piston in an infinite baffle, 3) the circular piston in a spherical baffle, 4) an approximation by Fant, and 5) an approximation by Flanagan. A comparison has been carried out between the acoustic impedances as a function of frequency predicted by these models for mouth aperture areas of 0.9 and 5.0 cm2. The basis for comparison was the piston-in-a-spherical-baffle model. This model was chosen as being the most physically representative one which is computationally tractable, although it is by far the most computationally difficult of the models considered. Special precautions were needed to prevent errors due to arithmetic overflow. On the basis of the comparison, a new approximation is proposed. This new model is based on the piston-in-an-infinite-baffle model, but includes more terms than the Flanagan model, resulting in increased accuracy for higher frequencies and larger mouth apertures.

Key concepts: Baffle, Piston (optics), Radiation impedance, Acoustics, Vocal tract, Aperture (computer memory), Acoustic radiation, Electrical impedance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Models for representing the acoustic radiation impedance of the mouth — Research Paper | ScholarLens